Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bimla Lal BegIn Vs. the Mineral Area Development Authority Through Its Managing Director and ors

Bimla Lal Begin vs The Mineral Area Development Authority Through Its Managing Director and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Sep 10, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1027618

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bimla Lal Begin

Respondent

The Mineral Area Development Authority Through Its Managing Director and ors

Excerpt

.....been paid as yet, though she has made representationbeforetherespondentsm.a.d.a.videannexure3 learnedcounselfortherespondentsm.a.d.asubmitsthat if the petitioner approaches the managing director, mada, respondent no.2 with fresh representation for redressal of her aforesaidgrievances,thesameshallbeconsideredinaccordance withlawasalsotheschemeframedforretiredemployee/deceased employeeof mada. inthesecircumstances,inamatterrelatingtopaymentof deathcumretiralbenefit,withoutcommentingupontheclaimof thepetitioner,thewritpetitionisdisposedofwithlibertytothe petitioner to approach the manging director, mineral area development authority, dhanbad, respondent no.2 with a fresh representation for redressal of her aforesaid grievances, with all supportingfactsanddocuments,withinaperiodofthreeweeks. onreceiptofsuchrepresentation,themangingdirector,m.a.d.a., dhanbad,respondentno.2shallconsiderthesameinaccordance 2. withlawandafterproperverificationoftheservicerecordsofthe deceasedemployee,passareasonedandspeakingorder,withina period of twelve weeks thereafter, which shall also be communicatedtothepetitioner.iftheclaimofthepetitioneron accountofdeathcumretiralbenefit,andotherservicearrearsare foundtobegenuineandlegallyadmissible,thesameshallalsobe disbursedtoherinaccordancewiththeschemeapplicabletosuch retired employees/deceased employee of mada along with statutoryinterest,ifany. the writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observationsanddirections. (apareshkumarsingh,j) jk

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.2332of2013 BimlaLalBegin....................................Petitioner Versus MineralAreaDevelopmentAuthority&others..............Respondent. CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioner :Mr.P.K.Mukhopadhyay,Adv. FortheRespondents :M/s.BhaweshKumar,RaviKumar &Kr.RahulKamlesh,Advs. 02/10.9.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. ThepetitionerissaidtobethewidowofLateRichhpalLal Begi,issaidtohavediedon16thMay,2012afterhavingretired fromtheservicesofRespondentsM.A.D.A.,Dhanbadonthepost ofMateunderJhariaHealthCircle,M.A.D.A.on31stDecember, 2011. Thegrievanceofthepetitioneristhatthedeathcumretiral duesofthedeceasedemployeeaswellasarrearsofservicedues suchasgratuity,dearnessallowance,interimreliefbenefitsofpay revision and A.C.P. as well as other admissible dues with 12% interest have not been paid as yet, though she has made representationbeforetheRespondentsM.A.D.A.videAnnexure3 LearnedcounselfortheRespondentsM.A.D.Asubmitsthat if the petitioner approaches the Managing Director, MADA, respondent no.2 with fresh representation for redressal of her aforesaidgrievances,thesameshallbeconsideredinaccordance withlawasalsotheschemeframedforretiredemployee/deceased employeeof MADA. Inthesecircumstances,inamatterrelatingtopaymentof deathcumretiralbenefit,withoutcommentingupontheclaimof thepetitioner,thewritpetitionisdisposedofwithlibertytothe petitioner to approach the Manging Director, Mineral Area Development Authority, Dhanbad, respondent no.2 with a fresh representation for redressal of her aforesaid grievances, with all supportingfactsanddocuments,withinaperiodofthreeweeks. Onreceiptofsuchrepresentation,theMangingDirector,M.A.D.A., Dhanbad,respondentno.2shallconsiderthesameinaccordance 2. withlawandafterproperverificationoftheservicerecordsofthe deceasedemployee,passareasonedandspeakingorder,withina period of twelve weeks thereafter, which shall also be communicatedtothepetitioner.Iftheclaimofthepetitioneron accountofdeathcumretiralbenefit,andotherservicearrearsare foundtobegenuineandlegallyadmissible,thesameshallalsobe disbursedtoherinaccordancewiththeschemeapplicabletosuch retired employees/deceased employee of MADA along with statutoryinterest,ifany. The writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observationsanddirections. (ApareshKumarSingh,J) jk

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial