Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

United States Vs. Cotton

United States vs Cotton

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Feb-24-1970
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102644

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
397 U.S. 45
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

United States

Respondent

Cotton

Excerpt

united states v. cotton - 397 u.s. 45 (1970) u.s. supreme court united states v. cotton, 397 u.s. 45 (1970) united states v. cotton no. 1022 decided february 24, 1970 397 u.s. 45 appeal from the united states district court for the eastern district of wisconsin syllabus appeal dismissed. per curiam. the motion of the appellees for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. the motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for failure to docket the case within the time prescribed by rule 13. mr. justice douglas, dissenting. the requirement for filing the record in an appeal within the time prescribed by rule 13 is not jurisdictional. rather, it is a provision of our own rule which we often waive in the interests of justice. we should waive it here. the appeal now dismissed was solely protective under 18 u.s.c. § 3731. the main remedy sought was mandamus in the court of appeals, and the record naturally went to that court, not here. the issue tendered by the appeal now dismissed is whether the district court properly dismissed the indictment, because there could be no "fair trial" in the district at that time, and that, if a continuance was granted, appellees would be denied a speedy trial guaranteed by the constitution. that is an important question we should hear and decide.

Full Judgment

United States v. Cotton - 397 U.S. 45 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Cotton, 397 U.S. 45 (1970)

United States v. Cotton

No. 1022

Decided February 24, 1970

397 U.S. 45

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

SYLLABUS

Appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the appellees for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for failure to docket the case within the time prescribed by Rule 13.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, dissenting.

The requirement for filing the record in an appeal within the time prescribed by Rule 13 is not jurisdictional. Rather, it is a provision of our own Rule which we often waive in the interests of justice. We should waive it here. The appeal now dismissed was solely protective under 18 U.S.C. § 3731. The main remedy sought was mandamus in the Court of Appeals, and the record naturally went to that court, not here. The issue tendered by the appeal now dismissed is whether the District Court properly dismissed the indictment, because there could be no "fair trial" in the district at that time, and that, if a continuance was granted, appellees would be denied a speedy trial guaranteed by the Constitution.

That is an important question we should hear and decide.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial