Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rakesh Kumar Singh Alias Rakesh Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Rakesh Kumar Singh Alias Rakesh Singh vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Sep 03, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1025280

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rakesh Kumar Singh Alias Rakesh Singh

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

.....code. so far offence under section 307 of the ipc is concerned, there is general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons. it is submitted that informant had received no injury, thus he has not been sent for medical examination. so far, the allegation of snatching of chain and taking away sum of rs. 49,000/- is concerned, it is submitted that the same has been falsely alleged . it is submitted that on 3.3.2013 informant had issued a cheque in favour of petitioner towards freight of vehicle, taken on rent. it is submitted that when petitioner presented said cheque for encashment, the same has been dishonoured. it is submitted that when petitioner made complaint about the same, present case has been filed. considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance and also taking into account that co-accused rakesh agrawal @ rakesh prasad has been granted anticipatory bail by this court vide order dated 14.5.2013 in aba no. 1563 of 2013, i allow this application and direct the petitioner to surrender in the court below by 13.09.2013 and in that event the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioner, above named, on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned s.d.j.m., jamshedpur in connection with mango ( olidih) p.s. case no. 110 of 2013 ( g.r. no. 742 of 2013) , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr.p.c. ( prashant kumar,j.) sharda/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2655 of 2013 Rakesh Kumar Singh @ Rakesh Singh... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. M.B. Tripathy, Sr. Advocate For the State: Mr. Amitabh , APP 2/03.09.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Rakesh Kumar Singh @ Rakesh Singh is moved by Sri B.M. Tripathy, Sr. Advocate and opposed by Sri Amitabh, learned Additional P.P. This is a case under sections 147,149,323,307,448,379 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code. So far offence under section 307 of the IPC is concerned, there is general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons. It is submitted that informant had received no injury, thus he has not been sent for medical examination. So far, the allegation of snatching of chain and taking away sum of Rs. 49,000/- is concerned, it is submitted that the same has been falsely alleged . It is submitted that on 3.3.2013 informant had issued a cheque in favour of petitioner towards freight of vehicle, taken on rent. It is submitted that when petitioner presented said cheque for encashment, the same has been dishonoured. It is submitted that when petitioner made complaint about the same, present case has been filed. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance and also taking into account that co-accused Rakesh Agrawal @ Rakesh Prasad has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 14.5.2013 in ABA No. 1563 of 2013, I allow this application and direct the petitioner to surrender in the court below by 13.09.2013 and in that event the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioner, above named, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Jamshedpur in connection with Mango ( Olidih) P.S. Case No. 110 of 2013 ( G.R. No. 742 of 2013) , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial