Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

MobIn Khan Vs. State of Jharkhand

MobIn Khan vs State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Aug 31, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1025255

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

MobIn Khan

Respondent

State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b. a. no. 6231 of 2013 mobin khan ..... petitioner versus the state of jharkhand .. opposite party -------- coram : honble mr. justice h. c. mishra ------ for the petitioner : mr. rajesh kumar, advocate for the state : a.p.p. -------- 2/ 31.08.2013 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned a.p.p. for the prosecution. the petitioner has been made accused for the offence under section 395 of the indian penal code, in connection with sadar muffasil p.s. case no. 219 of 2010 corresponding to g.r. no. 996 of 2010. the case relates to dacoity and the case was instituted against unknown. the impugned order shows that the petitioner has been remanded in this case from another case. learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was not put on test identification parade and has prayed for bail. learned a.p.p. for the state has opposed the prayer, but upon going through the case diary, he has submitted that test identification parade was not held in the case. in the facts of this case, i am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, mobin khan, on bail. accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, hazaribag, in connection with sadar muffasil p.s. case no. 219 of 2010 corresponding to g.r. no. 996 of 2010. ( h. c. mishra, j.) r.kr.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 6231 of 2013 Mobin Khan ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 2/ 31.08.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Sadar Muffasil P.S. Case No. 219 of 2010 corresponding to G.R. No. 996 of 2010. The case relates to dacoity and the case was instituted against unknown. The impugned order shows that the petitioner has been remanded in this case from another case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was not put on test identification parade and has prayed for bail. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer, but upon going through the case diary, he has submitted that test identification parade was not held in the case. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Mobin Khan, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribag, in connection with Sadar Muffasil P.S. Case No. 219 of 2010 corresponding to G.R. No. 996 of 2010. ( H. C. Mishra, J.) R.Kr.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial