Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Smt. Tara Devi Vs. Satpaul Singh and ors

Smt. Tara Devi vs Satpaul Singh and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Aug 23, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1024921

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Smt. Tara Devi

Respondent

Satpaul Singh and ors

Excerpt

inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi m.a.no.293of2008 smt.taradevi appellant versus theorientalinsurancecompanyltd.&another respondents coram: honblemr.justiced.n.upadhyay fortheappellant :none forther2 :mr.a.kumarmishra,advocate 11/23.08.2013 thecounselfortheappellantisabsent. i.a.no.2685of2008hasbeenfiledtocondonethedelayof134daysin filingthisappeal. thecounselforr2seekstimetofilereply. theappealhasbeendismissedagainstr1. thecounselforr3isalsoabsent. listthiscaseaftertwoweeks. (d.n.upadhyay,j.) nkc

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI M.A.No.293of2008 Smt.TaraDevi Appellant Versus TheOrientalInsuranceCompanyLtd.&Another Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY FortheAppellant :None FortheR2 :Mr.A.KumarMishra,Advocate 11/23.08.2013 Thecounselfortheappellantisabsent. I.A.No.2685of2008hasbeenfiledtocondonethedelayof134daysin filingthisappeal. ThecounselforR2seekstimetofilereply. TheappealhasbeendismissedagainstR1. ThecounselforR3isalsoabsent. Listthiscaseaftertwoweeks. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) NKC

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial