Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Krishna Murari and ors Vs. Science and Technology

Krishna Murari and ors vs Science and Technology

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Aug 26, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1024831

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Krishna Murari and ors

Respondent

Science and Technology

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.(s). no. 2934 of 2013 krishna murari & others .... petitioner versus state of jharkhand & others ..... respondents ---------- coram: honble mr. justice aparesh kumar singh for the petitioner : mr. abhishek sinha for the state : j.c. to g.a. for the respondent no.5 : mrs. richa sanchita 07/26.08.2013 by the last order the proposed amendments were allowed to be incorporated by filing an amended writ petition. learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.5, the accountant general, who has also been impleaded as party by the last order dated 23.8.2013 seeks time to file their response to the writ petition in which the pay slip of the current salary of the petitioner is under challenge. in that view of the matter, let this case be adjourned for two weeks. in the meantime, petitioner is at liberty to withdraw the salary as fixed in the current pay scale. (aparesh kumar singh, j.) a. mohanty

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 2934 of 2013 Krishna Murari & others .... Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Sinha For the State : J.C. to G.A. For the Respondent No.5 : Mrs. Richa Sanchita 07/26.08.2013 By the last order the proposed amendments were allowed to be incorporated by filing an amended writ petition. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.5, the Accountant General, who has also been impleaded as party by the last order dated 23.8.2013 seeks time to file their response to the writ petition in which the pay slip of the current salary of the petitioner is under challenge. In that view of the matter, let this case be adjourned for two weeks. In the meantime, petitioner is at liberty to withdraw the salary as fixed in the current pay scale. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.) A. Mohanty

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial