Kamlesh Kumar Singh Vs. Sudha Devi

Kamlesh Kumar Singh vs Sudha Devi

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Aug 26, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1024818

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1024818
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Aug 26, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kamlesh Kumar Singh

Respondent

Sudha Devi

Excerpt

.....but the same was not deposited towards the cost of litigationbeforethelearnedtrialcourt,andtherefore,thef.a.no.884 of2006wasdismissedfordefaultvideorderdated23rdaugust,2012.6. counselappearingfortheapplicantsubmittedthatduetosome communication gap between the advocate and the appellant, the amount was not deposited, despite the order passed by this court dated23rdjuly,2012.but,nowthedemanddraftofrs.20,000/has already been handed over to the counsel appearing for the respondentno.1andthetherespondentno.1hasreceivedthesaid demanddraft.7. having heard the counsel for the applicant as well as the counselfortherespondentno.1andlookingtothereasonsstatedin thispetition,thisc.m.pisallowedandtheorderpassedbythiscourt dated 23rd august, 2012 in f.a. no.884 of 2006 is recalled. f.a. no.884 of 2006 is restored to its original filed with the same number.8. thisc.m.p.isallowedanddisposedof.9. registryisdirectedtoenlistf.a.no.884of2006ontheboardof admissionon9thseptember,2013. i.a.no.6249of2013 10. inviewoftheaforesaidorders,noorderisrequiredtobepassed ini.a.no.6249of2013,whichismeantforcosttocontestthisc.m.p.11. i.a.no.6249of2013isalsoherebydisposedof. (d.n.patel,a.c.j.) (shreechandrashekhar,j.) manish/r.k.

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI I.A.No.174of2013 with I.A.No.6249of2013 in C.M.P .No.641of2012 KamleshKumarSingh ... ... Petitioner Versus SudhaDevi&Anr. ... ... Respondents CORAM :HONEBLETHEACTINGCHIEFJUSTICE :HON'BLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR ForthePetitioner :M/s.RajivNandanPd.,RajeshKumar,Adv. FortheRespondentNo.1:Mr.S.L.Agarwal,Advocate th 05/Dated:26 August,2013 PerD.N.Patel,A.C.J.

I.A.No.174of2013 1. Thisapplicationhasbeenpreferredforcondonationofdelayof 48daysinpreferringthisC.M.P.

2. Havingheardthecounselforboththesidesandalsolookingto thereasonsstatedintheI.A.,speciallyinparanos.4&5,thereare reasonablereasonsforcondonationofdelayinpreferringthisC.M.P.

3. We,therefore,condonethedelayinpreferringthisC.M.P.

4. I.A.No.174of2013isallowedanddisposedofaccordingly. C.M.P.No.641of2012 5. ThepresentpetitionhasbeenpreferredforrestorationofF.A. No. 884 of 2006, which was dismissed for want of deposition of Rs.20,000/. The order was dismissed for default on 23rd August, 2012.Previously,theorderwaspassedon23rdJuly,2012todeposit Rs.20,000/, but the same was not deposited towards the cost of litigationbeforethelearnedtrialcourt,andtherefore,theF.A.No.884 of2006wasdismissedfordefaultvideorderdated23rdAugust,2012.

6. counselappearingfortheapplicantsubmittedthatduetosome communication gap between the advocate and the appellant, the amount was not deposited, despite the order passed by this court dated23rdJuly,2012.But,nowthedemanddraftofRs.20,000/has already been handed over to the counsel appearing for the RespondentNo.1andthetheRespondentNo.1hasreceivedthesaid demanddraft.

7. Having heard the counsel for the applicant as well as the counselfortheRespondentNo.1andlookingtothereasonsstatedin thispetition,thisC.M.PisallowedandtheorderpassedbythisCourt dated 23rd August, 2012 in F.A. No.884 of 2006 is recalled. F.A. No.884 of 2006 is restored to its original filed with the same number.

8. ThisC.M.P.isallowedanddisposedof.

9. RegistryisdirectedtoenlistF.A.No.884of2006ontheboardof Admissionon9thSeptember,2013. I.A.No.6249of2013 10. Inviewoftheaforesaidorders,noorderisrequiredtobepassed inI.A.No.6249of2013,whichismeantforcosttocontestthisC.M.P.

11. I.A.No.6249of2013isalsoherebydisposedof. (D.N.Patel,A.C.J.) (ShreeChandrashekhar,J.) Manish/R.K.

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties Kamlesh Kumar Singh vs Sudha Devi Same Subject Education