Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Lata Devi and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors

Lata Devi and ors vs State of Jharkhand and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Aug 22, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1024803

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Lata Devi and ors

Respondent

State of Jharkhand and ors

Excerpt

inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi c.m.p.no.375of2012 latadevi petitioner versus thestateofjharkhand&ors. respondents coram: hon'bletheactingchiefjustice hon'blemr.justiceshreechandrashekhar forthepetitioner : none forthestate : j.c.tog.p.iii 03/dated:22 nd august,2013 perd.n.patel,a.c.j.:1. when the matter is called out, learned counsel for the petitioner is absent.neitherthematterismentionednoranybodyappearsonbehalfofthe petitioner.2. hence,thispetitionisdismissedfordefault. (d.n.patel,a.c.j.) (shreechandrashekhar,j.) ajay/

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI C.M.P.No.375of2012 LataDevi Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&ors. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLETHEACTINGCHIEFJUSTICE HON'BLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR ForthePetitioner : None FortheState : J.C.toG.P.III 03/Dated:22 nd August,2013 PerD.N.Patel,A.C.J.:

1. When the matter is called out, learned counsel for the petitioner is absent.Neitherthematterismentionednoranybodyappearsonbehalfofthe petitioner.

2. Hence,thispetitionisdismissedfordefault. (D.N.Patel,A.C.J.) (ShreeChandrashekhar,J.) Ajay/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial