Skip to content


Stamler Vs. Willis - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

US Supreme Court

Decided On

Case Number

393 U.S. 407

Appellant

Stamler

Respondent

Willis

Excerpt:


stamler v. willis - 393 u.s. 407 (1969) u.s. supreme court stamler v. willis, 393 u.s. 407 (1969) 393 u.s. 407 stamler et al. v. willis et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of illinois. no. 478. decided january 20, 1969. * [ footnote * ] together with no. 479, cohen v. willis et al., also on appeal from the same court. rehearing denied; ante, p. 217, vacated; 287 f. supp. 734, vacated and remanded. albert e. jenner, jr., thomas p. sullivan, and arthur kinoy for appellants in no. 478 on the petition for rehearing and motion to amend. per curiam. the petition for a rehearing is denied. the motion to amend the judgment entered on november 25, 1968, dismissing the appeals is granted. the judgment dismissing the appeals is vacated and a new judgment will issue providing that the judgment below be vacated and the cases be remanded to the district court so that it may enter a fresh decree from which timely appeals may be taken to the court of appeals. mr. justice marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases. page 393 u.s. 407, 408

Judgment:


STAMLER v. WILLIS - 393 U.S. 407 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court STAMLER v. WILLIS, 393 U.S. 407 (1969) 393 U.S. 407

STAMLER ET AL. v. WILLIS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 478.
Decided January 20, 1969. *

[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 479, Cohen v. Willis et al., also on appeal from the same court.

Rehearing denied; ante, p. 217, vacated; 287 F. Supp. 734, vacated and remanded.

Albert E. Jenner, Jr., Thomas P. Sullivan, and Arthur Kinoy for appellants in No. 478 on the petition for rehearing and motion to amend.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a rehearing is denied. The motion to amend the judgment entered on November 25, 1968, dismissing the appeals is granted. The judgment dismissing the appeals is vacated and a new judgment will issue providing that the judgment below be vacated and the cases be remanded to the District Court so that it may enter a fresh decree from which timely appeals may be taken to the Court of Appeals.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Page 393 U.S. 407, 408




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //