Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rosado Vs. Wyman

Rosado vs Wyman

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-23-1969
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102285

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
395 U.S. 826
Subject
Company

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Company

Key legal issue
Company

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rosado

Respondent

Wyman

Excerpt

rosado v. wyman - 395 u.s. 826 (1969) u.s. supreme court rosado v. wyman, 395 u.s. 826 (1969) 395 u.s. 826 rosado et al. v. wyman, commissioner of social services for the state of new york, et al. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit. no. 1539. decided june 23, 1969. * no. 1539, certiorari before judgment denied; no. 1540, appeal dismissed. [ footnote * ] together with no. 1540, rosado et al. v. wyman, commissioner of social services for the state of new york, et al., on appeal from the united states district court for the eastern district of new york. carl rachlin, martin garbus, james spitzer, and morton friedman for petitioners in no. 1539 and appellants in no. 1540. louis j. lefkowitz, attorney general of new york, samuel a. hirshowitz, first assistant attorney general, amy juviler, assistant attorney general, and philip weinberg for respondents in no. 1539 and appellees in no. 1540. morris h. schneider and jack goldberg for barbaro et al., and alan h. levine, eleanor holmes norton, martin m. berger, and jerome kretchmer for the american civil liberties union et al., as amici curiae. per curiam. the motion of joseph barbaro et al. and american civil liberties union et al. for leave to file briefs as amici curiae are granted. the motion to expedite review is denied. the application to vacate the stays granted by the page 395 u.s. 826, 827 court of appeals on june 11, 1969, and june 19, 1969, of the injunctions of the district court, presented to mr. justice brennan, and by him referred to the court, is denied. the petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment in no. 1539 is denied. the appeal in no. 1540 is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. mengelkoch v. industrial welfare commission, 393 u.s. 83 (1968); wilson v. port lavaca, 391 u.s. 352 (1968). mr. justice douglas and mr. justice ha

Full Judgment

ROSADO v. WYMAN - 395 U.S. 826 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court ROSADO v. WYMAN, 395 U.S. 826 (1969) 395 U.S. 826

ROSADO ET AL. v. WYMAN, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SERVICES FOR THE
STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 1539.
Decided June 23, 1969. *

No. 1539, certiorari before judgment denied; No. 1540, appeal dismissed.

[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 1540, Rosado et al. v. Wyman, Commissioner of Social Services for the State of New York, et al., on appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

Carl Rachlin, Martin Garbus, James Spitzer, and Morton Friedman for petitioners in No. 1539 and appellants in No. 1540.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, Amy Juviler, Assistant Attorney General, and Philip Weinberg for respondents in No. 1539 and appellees in No. 1540.

Morris H. Schneider and Jack Goldberg for Barbaro et al., and Alan H. Levine, Eleanor Holmes Norton, Martin M. Berger, and Jerome Kretchmer for the American Civil Liberties Union et al., as amici curiae.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of Joseph Barbaro et al. and American Civil Liberties Union et al. for leave to file briefs as amici curiae are granted. The motion to expedite review is denied.

The application to vacate the stays granted by the

Page 395 U.S. 826, 827

Court of Appeals on June 11, 1969, and June 19, 1969, of the injunctions of the District Court, presented to MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN, and by him referred to the Court, is denied.

The petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment in No. 1539 is denied. The appeal in No. 1540 is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Mengelkoch v. Industrial Welfare Commission, 393 U.S. 83 (1968); Wilson v. Port Lavaca, 391 U.S. 352 (1968).

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial