Ashraf Vs. State of Kerala

Ashraf vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 31, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1022335

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1022335
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice P.Bhavadasan
Decided On: Jul 31, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ashraf

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....s.i. of police, kunnamkulam police station, thrissur district”503. r1 & r2 by public prosecutor sri.roy thomas this bail application having come up for admission on 31-07-2013, the court on the same day passed the following: sts - -b.a.-no.- 5235 -of- -2013- - - -p. - bhavadasan,- j.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - dated this the 31st day of july, 2013. order it is submitted by the learned public prosecutor that final report has been filed and the court concerned took cognizance of the offence as c.p. 19 of 2013. it is also pointed out by the learned public prosecutor that steps under sections 82 and 83 of cr.p.c. have already been resorted to by the court below and under such circumstances, question of considering the anticipatory bail application does not arise for consideration.2. learned public prosecutor is right in his submission that since steps under sections 82 and 83 cr.p.c. have been initiated, question of granting anticipatory bail does not arise for consideration. however, if the petitioner is so advised, he may surrender before the court which initiated proceedings under sections 82 and 83 cr.p.c. and move that court for necessary b.a.5235/2013. 2 reliefs including bail, which that court shall consider in accordance with law and in the light of the averments made in this petition. p. bhavadasan, judge sb.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JULY 2013 9TH SRAVANA, 1935 Bail Appl..No. 5235 of 2013 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 391/2004 OF KUNNAMKULAM POLICE STATION , THRISSUR DISTRICT ----------------------------------------------------- PETITIONER/ACCUSED : ------------------------------------------ ASHRAF, S/O.SALAM,AGED 4 YEARS, THAZHATHETHIL, CHANGARAMKULAM, PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.SHAJI P.CHALY SRI.R.SANJITH RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT : ------------------------------------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM.

2. S.I. OF POLICE, KUNNAMKULAM POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT”

503. R1 & R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.ROY THOMAS THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31-07-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts - -B.A.-No.- 5235 -of- -2013- - - -P. - BHAVADASAN,- J.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 31st day of July, 2013. ORDER It is submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor that final report has been filed and the court concerned took cognizance of the offence as C.P. 19 of 2013. It is also pointed out by the learned Public Prosecutor that steps under Sections 82 and 83 of Cr.P.C. have already been resorted to by the court below and under such circumstances, question of considering the anticipatory bail application does not arise for consideration.

2. Learned Public Prosecutor is right in his submission that since steps under Sections 82 and 83 Cr.P.C. have been initiated, question of granting anticipatory bail does not arise for consideration. However, if the petitioner is so advised, he may surrender before the court which initiated proceedings under Sections 82 and 83 Cr.P.C. and move that court for necessary B.A.5235/2013. 2 reliefs including bail, which that court shall consider in accordance with law and in the light of the averments made in this petition. P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE sb.

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2013 Same Parties Ashraf vs State of Kerala Same Subject Education Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice P.Bhavadasan