Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Anil Kumar Vs. State of Kerala

Anil Kumar vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Aug 27, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1022232

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anil Kumar

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice p.bhavadasan tuesday, the 27th day of august 2013 5th bhadra, 1935 crl.mc.no. 3626 of 2013 () --------------------------- crime no. 496/2013 of maranallor police station , thiruvananthapuram ----------------------------------------- petitioner/2nd accused: --------------------------------------------- anil kumar,s/o.karunakaran, pooram nivas, eravaikonam, thirupurathoor desom, thirupuram village, neyyattinkara. by adv. sri.r.gopan respondents/sate & defacto complainant: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. state of kerala, represented by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam.2. retnakumari, d/o.sumathy, saketham, vadakevazhapally, kandala p.o., thiruvananthapuram district-695 001. r1 by public prosecutor sri.dhanesh mathew manjooran this criminal misc. case having come up for admission on 27-08-2013, the court on the same day passed the following: sts p.bhavadasan, j.--------------------------------------- crl.m.c. no.3626 of 201.--------------------------------------- dated this the 27th day of august, 2013. order after having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner for some time, this court expressed its disinclination to entertain the crl.m.c. then the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the crl.m.c. permission granted and this crl.m.c is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- p.bhavadasan judge smp // true copy // p.a. to judge.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN TUESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST 2013 5TH BHADRA, 1935 Crl.MC.No. 3626 of 2013 () --------------------------- CRIME NO. 496/2013 OF MARANALLOR POLICE STATION , THIRUVANANTHAPURAM ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER/2ND ACCUSED: --------------------------------------------- ANIL KUMAR,S/O.KARUNAKARAN, POORAM NIVAS, ERAVAIKONAM, THIRUPURATHOOR DESOM, THIRUPURAM VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA. BY ADV. SRI.R.GOPAN RESPONDENTS/SATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

2. RETNAKUMARI, D/O.SUMATHY, SAKETHAM, VADAKEVAZHAPALLY, KANDALA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695 001. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.DHANESH MATHEW MANJOORAN THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-08-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts P.BHAVADASAN, J.

--------------------------------------- Crl.M.C. No.3626 OF 201.--------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of August, 2013. ORDER

After having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner for some time, this Court expressed its disinclination to entertain the Crl.M.C. Then the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the Crl.M.C. Permission granted and this Crl.M.C is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- P.BHAVADASAN JUDGE smp // True Copy // P.A. to Judge.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial