Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

B. Surendra Das Vs. the District Magistrate

B. Surendra Das vs The District Magistrate

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Aug 13, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1022183

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

B. Surendra Das

Respondent

The District Magistrate

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice k.surendra mohan tuesday, the 13th day of august 2013 22nd sravana, 1935 wp(c).no. 20080 of 2013 (h) ---------------------------- petitioner(s): ----------------------- b. surendra das, aged 5 years, s/o.late bhanu panicker, proprietor, hotel krithika international, vizhinjam p.o.,thiruvananthapuram. by adv. sri.k.b.pradeep. respondent(s): ------------------------- 1. the district magistrate, office of the district collector, kudapanakunnu, thiruvananthapuram ”001. 2. the state police chief, government of kerala, thiruvananthapuram ”001. by sr. govt.pleader mr.c.s. manilal. this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 13-08-2013, the court on the same day delivered the following: rs. wp(c).no. 20080 of 2013 (h) appendix petitioner's exhibits:- ext.p1: true copy of order dated 10 08/2013 of the 1st respondent bearing no.s11.65181/2013. respondent's exhibits:- nil. //true copy// p.a. to judge. rs. k.surendra mohan, j.-------------------------------------------------- w.p.(c)no.20080 of 2013 -------------------------------------------------- dated this the 13th day of august, 2013 judgment the learned government pleader has handed over to me in court, order not s9-65181/2013 dated 13.8.2013, by which the district magistrate has withdrawn the order that is under challenge in this writ petition. therefore, recording the above fact, this writ petition is disposed of. sd/-(k.surendra mohan) judge. dsn

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2013 22ND SRAVANA, 1935 WP(C).No. 20080 of 2013 (H) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- B. SURENDRA DAS, AGED 5 YEARS, S/O.LATE BHANU PANICKER, PROPRIETOR, HOTEL KRITHIKA INTERNATIONAL, VIZHINJAM P.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.B.PRADEEP. RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KUDAPANAKUNNU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM ”

001.

2. THE STATE POLICE CHIEF, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM ”

001. BY SR. GOVT.PLEADER MR.C.S. MANILAL. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-08-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. WP(C).No. 20080 of 2013 (H) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 10 08/2013 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT BEARING NO.S11.65181/2013. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. rs. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J.

-------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.20080 Of 2013 -------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 13th DAY OF AUGUST, 2013 JUDGMENT

The learned Government Pleader has handed over to me in Court, Order not S9-65181/2013 dated 13.8.2013, by which the District Magistrate has withdrawn the order that is under challenge in this Writ Petition. Therefore, recording the above fact, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Sd/-(K.SURENDRA MOHAN) JUDGE. dsn

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial