Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Carlton Vs. Conner

Carlton vs Conner

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Dec-15-1969
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102215

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
396 U.S. 272
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Carlton

Respondent

Conner

Excerpt

carlton v. conner - 396 u.s. 272 (1969) u.s. supreme court carlton v. conner, 396 u.s. 272 (1969) 396 u.s. 272 carlton et al. v. conner, commissioner of agriculture of florida appeal from the supreme court of florida no. 625. decided december 15, 1969 223 so.2d 324, appeal dismissed. john r. beranek and charles h. damsel, jr., for appellants. robert a. chastain for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 396 u.s. 272, 273

Full Judgment

CARLTON v. CONNER - 396 U.S. 272 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court CARLTON v. CONNER, 396 U.S. 272 (1969) 396 U.S. 272

CARLTON ET AL. v. CONNER, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE OF FLORIDA
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
No. 625.
Decided December 15, 1969

223 So.2d 324, appeal dismissed.

John R. Beranek and Charles H. Damsel, Jr., for appellants.

Robert A. Chastain for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 396 U.S. 272, 273



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial