Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jeevan Vs. .......

Jeevan vs .......

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Aug 16, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1021977

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jeevan

Respondent

.......

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice k.m.joseph & the honourable mr. justice a.hariprasad friday, the 16th day of august 2013 25th sravana, 193521082013 mfa(succession act) no. 76 of 2013 (d) ------------------------------------ against the order in sop 26/2011 of iii addl.sub court, ernakulam dated 30 11-2011. appellant(s): ------------ jeevan, aged 5 years, s/0 late p.k.pankajakshan, kalimandiram, "jyotsana nivas", south chittoor”027. ernakulam district represented by power of attorney holder and wife smt.rajeswari, aged about 4 years, kalimandiram, "jyotsana nivas", south chittoor 68 027, ernakulam district. by advs.sri.n.subramaniam sri.m.s.narayanan sri.p.t.girijan smt.usha narayanan. respondent(s): nil. ------------- by government pleader sri.c.r.syamkumar. this misc. first appeal having come up for admission on 16-08-2013, the court on the same day delivered the following: amk k.m.joseph & a.hariprasad, jj.------------------------------------------------ m.f.a (succession act) no.76 of 201.------------------------------------------------- dated this the 16th day of august, 2013. judgmentk.m.joseph, j.learned counsel for the appellant would seek permission to withdraw succession o.p no. 26 of 2011 which resulted in the impugned order. in the circumstances, we are inclined to permit the appellant to withdraw succession o.p no.26 of 2011. accordingly, s.o.p will stand dismissed as withdrawn. the appeal is disposed of as above. sd/- k.m.joseph, judge. sd/- a.hariprasad, judge. amk //true copy// p.ato judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF AUGUST 2013 25TH SRAVANA, 193521082013 MFA(SUCCESSION ACT) No. 76 of 2013 (D) ------------------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER IN SOP 26/2011 of III ADDL.SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM DATED 30 11-2011. APPELLANT(S): ------------ JEEVAN, AGED 5 YEARS, S/0 LATE P.K.PANKAJAKSHAN, KALIMANDIRAM, "JYOTSANA NIVAS", SOUTH CHITTOOR”

027. ERNAKULAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER AND WIFE SMT.RAJESWARI, AGED ABOUT 4 YEARS, KALIMANDIRAM, "JYOTSANA NIVAS", SOUTH CHITTOOR 68 027, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.N.SUBRAMANIAM SRI.M.S.NARAYANAN SRI.P.T.GIRIJAN SMT.USHA NARAYANAN. RESPONDENT(S): NIL. ------------- BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.R.SYAMKUMAR. THIS MISC. FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-08-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: amk K.M.JOSEPH & A.HARIPRASAD, JJ.

------------------------------------------------ M.F.A (Succession Act) No.76 OF 201.------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of August, 2013. JUDGMENT

K.M.Joseph, J.

Learned counsel for the appellant would seek permission to withdraw Succession O.P No. 26 of 2011 which resulted in the impugned order. In the circumstances, we are inclined to permit the appellant to withdraw Succession O.P No.26 of 2011. Accordingly, S.O.P will stand dismissed as withdrawn. The appeal is disposed of as above. Sd/- K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE. Sd/- A.HARIPRASAD, JUDGE. amk //True Copy// P.Ato Judge

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial