Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Paulose Vs. State of Kerala

Paulose vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 29, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1021365

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Paulose

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice k.harilal monday,the 29th day of july 2013 7th sravana, 1935 crl.rev.pet.no. 389 of 2013 () ----------------------------------------- against the order in mc 166/12/m(5972/12/d) of sub divisional magistrate court, fort kochi. ............ revision petitioners/counter petitioners: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. paulose s/o. varkey, olikkara house, paingarappilly mulanthuruthy village, ernakulam.2. annam w/o. paulose, olikkara house, paingarappilly mulanthuruthy village, ernakulam. by advs.sri. t. prasad sri.a.haroon rasheed respondents/complainant & state ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. state of kerala represented by the sub divisional magistrate fortkochi, through the public prosecutor high court of kerala, ernakluam.2. anoop p. malayil puthanpura, paingarappilly, mulanthuruthy village, paingarappilly, ernakulam - 682314.3. abhilash k.nair kanakkacheril, mulanthuruthy village, paingarappilly ernakulam-682314. r1 by public prosecutor sri.liju v.stephen r2 by advs. smt.k.anila sri.joseph c.varghese this criminal revision petition having been finally heard on 29-07-2013, the court on the same day passed the following: tss k.harilal, j.= = = = = = = = = = = = = = crl.r.p.no.389 of 2013 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = dated this the 29th day of july, 2013 order it is seen that the matter had been referred to mediation centre for mediation at the desire of both parties. the report filed by the mediator shows that both parties settled the dispute and arrived at a settlement. the settlement arrived at by the parties also incorporated with the report of the mediator and both counsel submit that the terms of settlement is agreed by both parties. in view of the above submission made by the counsel appearing for the revision petitioners and for the respondents, this revision petition is closed. k.harilal, judge. stu //true.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL MONDAY,THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2013 7TH SRAVANA, 1935 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 389 of 2013 () ----------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN MC 166/12/M(5972/12/D) of SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE COURT, FORT KOCHI. ............ REVISION PETITIONERS/COUNTER PETITIONERS: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. PAULOSE S/O. VARKEY, OLIKKARA HOUSE, PAINGARAPPILLY MULANTHURUTHY VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM.

2. ANNAM W/O. PAULOSE, OLIKKARA HOUSE, PAINGARAPPILLY MULANTHURUTHY VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM. BY ADVS.SRI. T. PRASAD SRI.A.HAROON RASHEED RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT & STATE ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE FORTKOCHI, THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKLUAM.

2. ANOOP P. MALAYIL PUTHANPURA, PAINGARAPPILLY, MULANTHURUTHY VILLAGE, PAINGARAPPILLY, ERNAKULAM - 682314.

3. ABHILASH K.NAIR KANAKKACHERIL, MULANTHURUTHY VILLAGE, PAINGARAPPILLY ERNAKULAM-682314. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.LIJU V.STEPHEN R2 BY ADVS. SMT.K.ANILA SRI.JOSEPH C.VARGHESE THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29-07-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: tss K.HARILAL, J.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = Crl.R.P.No.389 of 2013 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 29th day of July, 2013 ORDER

It is seen that the matter had been referred to Mediation Centre for mediation at the desire of both parties. The report filed by the Mediator shows that both parties settled the dispute and arrived at a settlement. The settlement arrived at by the parties also incorporated with the report of the Mediator and both counsel submit that the terms of settlement is agreed by both parties. In view of the above submission made by the counsel appearing for the Revision petitioners and for the respondents, this revision petition is closed. K.HARILAL, JUDGE. Stu //True copy// P.A to Judge.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial