Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

GoldsteIn Vs. Cox

Goldstein vs Cox

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jan-15-1968
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102133

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
389 U.S. 581
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Goldstein

Respondent

Cox

Excerpt

goldstein v. cox - 389 u.s. 581 (1968) u.s. supreme court goldstein v. cox, 389 u.s. 581 (1968) 389 u.s. 581 goldstein, aka pietraru, et al. v. cox et al., surrogates of the county of new york, et al. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit. no. 825. decided january 15, 1968. certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. john r. vintilla, emanuel eschwege and novak n. marku for petitioners. louis j. lefkowitz, attorney general of new york, and daniel m. cohen, assistant attorney general, for respondents. per curiam. the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is vacated. the case is remanded to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit for further consideration in light of zschernig v. miller, ante, p. 429. page 389 u.s. 581, 582

Full Judgment

GOLDSTEIN v. COX - 389 U.S. 581 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court GOLDSTEIN v. COX, 389 U.S. 581 (1968) 389 U.S. 581

GOLDSTEIN, AKA PIETRARU, ET AL. v. COX ET AL., SURROGATES OF THE COUNTY
OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 825.
Decided January 15, 1968.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

John R. Vintilla, Emanuel Eschwege and Novak N. Marku for petitioners.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and Daniel M. Cohen, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is vacated. The case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of Zschernig v. Miller, ante, p. 429.

Page 389 U.S. 581, 582



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial