Costello Vs. United States

Costello vs United States

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-04-1968

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102094

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/102094
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Mar-04-1968
Case Number: 390 U.S. 201
Subject: Direct Taxation

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Direct Taxation

Key legal issue: Direct Taxation

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Costello

Respondent

United States

Excerpt

costello v. united states - 390 u.s. 201 (1968) u.s. supreme court costello v. united states, 390 u.s. 201 (1968) 390 u.s. 201 costello v. united states. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit. no. 3. decided march 4, 1968. 352 f.2d 848 , vacated and remanded. ira b. grudberg and jacob d. zeldes for petitioner. solicitor general marshall, assistant attorney general vinson, francis x. beytagh, jr., beatrice rosenberg and theodore george gilinsky for the united states. per curiam. upon the suggestion of mootness by reason of the death of the petitioner, the judgment of the united states court of appeals for the second circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to the united states district court for the district of connecticut for such disposition as law and justice require. mr. justice marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 390 u.s. 201, 202

Full Judgment

COSTELLO v. UNITED STATES - 390 U.S. 201 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court COSTELLO v. UNITED STATES, 390 U.S. 201 (1968) 390 U.S. 201

COSTELLO v. UNITED STATES.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
No. 3.
Decided March 4, 1968.

352 F.2d 848 , vacated and remanded.

Ira B. Grudberg and Jacob D. Zeldes for petitioner.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Francis X. Beytagh, Jr., Beatrice Rosenberg and Theodore George Gilinsky for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

Upon the suggestion of mootness by reason of the death of the petitioner, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut for such disposition as law and justice require.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 390 U.S. 201, 202

Same Parties Costello vs United States Same Subject Direct Taxation