Wiseman Vs. Barby

Wiseman vs Barby

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-11-1968

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102077

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/102077
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Mar-11-1968
Case Number: 390 U.S. 339
Subject: Company

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Company

Key legal issue: Company

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Wiseman

Respondent

Barby

Excerpt

wiseman v. barby - 390 u.s. 339 (1968) u.s. supreme court wiseman v. barby, 390 u.s. 339 (1968) 390 u.s. 339 wiseman, director of internal revenue for the district of oklahoma v. barby et ux. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the tenth circuit. no. 871. decided march 11, 1968. certiorari granted; 380 f.2d 121 , reversed. solicitor general griswold, assistant attorney general rogovin, harris weinstein and grant w. wiprud for petitioner. john k. speck for respondents. per curiam. the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. commissioner v. p. g. lake, inc., 356 u.s. 260 . mr. justice stewart and mr. justice white are of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be granted and the case set down for oral argument. mr. justice douglas is of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied. page 390 u.s. 339, 340

Full Judgment

WISEMAN v. BARBY - 390 U.S. 339 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court WISEMAN v. BARBY, 390 U.S. 339 (1968) 390 U.S. 339

WISEMAN, DIRECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA v. BARBY
ET UX.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 871.
Decided March 11, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 380 F.2d 121 , reversed.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, Harris Weinstein and Grant W. Wiprud for petitioner.

John K. Speck for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Commissioner v. P. G. Lake, Inc., 356 U.S. 260 .

MR. JUSTICE STEWART and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be granted and the case set down for oral argument.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied.

Page 390 U.S. 339, 340

Same Parties Wiseman vs Barby Same Subject Company