Ross Vs. California

Ross vs California

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided May-27-1968

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101993

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/101993
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: May-27-1968
Case Number: 391 U.S. 470
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ross

Respondent

California

Excerpt

ross v. california - 391 u.s. 470 (1968) u.s. supreme court ross v. california, 391 u.s. 470 (1968) 391 u.s. 470 ross v. california. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of california. no. 798, misc. decided may 27, 1968. certiorari granted; 67 cal. 2d 64, 429 p.2d 606, reversed. thomas c. lynch, attorney general of california, william e. james, assistant attorney general, and walter r. jones, deputy attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is reversed. chapman v. california, 386 u.s. 18 , and anderson v. nelson, 390 u.s. 523 . mr. justice black is of the opinion that certiorari should be denied. page 391 u.s. 470, 471

Full Judgment

ROSS v. CALIFORNIA - 391 U.S. 470 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court ROSS v. CALIFORNIA, 391 U.S. 470 (1968) 391 U.S. 470

ROSS v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 798, Misc.
Decided May 27, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 67 Cal. 2d 64, 429 P.2d 606, reversed.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Walter R. Jones, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , and Anderson v. Nelson, 390 U.S. 523 .

MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.

Page 391 U.S. 470, 471

Same Parties Ross vs California Same Subject Land Acquisition