Dhiju Vs. Rajeev

Dhiju vs Rajeev

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 30, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1019861

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1019861
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice S.Siri Jagan
Decided On: Jul 30, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dhiju

Respondent

Rajeev

Excerpt

.....district.4. the city police commissioner, kochi city, ernakulam district, pin ”011. r3 & 3 by government pleader sri.sujith mathew this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 30-07-2013, the court on the same day delivered the following: pj wp(c).no. 18503 of 2013 (k) --------------------------------------- appendix petitioner(s)' exhibits ------------------------------------- exhibit p1. true copy of the representation dated 20 07.2013 submitted by the petitoner before the fourth respondent with copy to the third respondent. respondent(s)' exhibits --------------------------------------- nil. / true copy / p.s. to judge pj s.siri jagan & k.ramakrishnan, jj.------------------------------------------------- w.p.(c) no.18503 of 2013 ================= dated this the 30th day of july 2013 judgment ------------------- s.siri jagan, j.the learned counsel for the petitioner now submits that after the transfer of the incumbent of the 2nd respondent, there is no harassment from the police and therefore the writ petition may be closed. ordered accordingly. sd/- s.siri jagan, judge sd/- k.ramakrishnan, judge jm/ \\ true copy \\ pa to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN TUESDAY,THE 30TH DAY OF JULY 2013 8TH SRAVANA, 1935 WP(C).No. 18503 of 2013 (K) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS:-: --------------------------------------------- 1. DHIJU, S/O.VIDYADHARAN, AGED 3 YEARS, CHITTEYATH HOUSE, KUMBALAM, KUMBALAM P.O., KUMBALAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

2. MINI AMRITHALAL, W/O.LATE AMRITHALAL, AGED 4 YEARS, KANNANTHURA HOUSE, AYIKKAL P.O. SOUTH MALIPURAM, PUTHUVYPE VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:-: --------------------------------------------------- 1. RAJEEV, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 3 YEARS, SHIKA ENTERPRISES, THOPPUMPADY, OPPOSITE GEO BAR, THOPPUMPADY VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT PIN ”

005.

2. RAJESH, FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 4 YEARS, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALLURUTHY POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN ”

006.

3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, KOCHI ”

002. ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

4. THE CITY POLICE COMMISSIONER, KOCHI CITY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN ”

011. R3 & 3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SUJITH MATHEW THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-07-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PJ WP(C).No. 18503 of 2013 (K) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1. TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 20 07.2013 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITONER BEFORE THE FOURTH RESPONDENT WITH COPY TO THE THIRD RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL. / TRUE COPY / P.S. TO JUDGE PJ S.SIRI JAGAN & K.RAMAKRISHNAN, JJ.

------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.18503 of 2013 ================= Dated this the 30th day of July 2013 JUDGMENT

------------------- S.SIRI JAGAN, J.

The learned counsel for the petitioner now submits that after the transfer of the incumbent of the 2nd respondent, there is no harassment from the police and therefore the writ petition may be closed. Ordered accordingly. sd/- S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE sd/- K.RAMAKRISHNAN, JUDGE jm/ \\ TRUE COPY \\ PA TO JUDGE

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2013 Same Parties Dhiju vs Rajeev Same Subject Education Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice S.Siri Jagan