Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Williams Vs. Florida

Williams vs Florida

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-10-1968
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101963

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
392 U.S. 306
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Williams

Respondent

Florida

Excerpt

williams v. florida - 392 u.s. 306 (1968) u.s. supreme court williams v. florida, 392 u.s. 306 (1968) 392 u.s. 306 williams v. florida. on petition for writ of certiorari to the district court of appeal of florida, first district. no. 279, misc. decided june 10, 1968. certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. earl faircloth, attorney general of florida, and wallace e. allbritton, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment of the district court of appeal of florida, first district, is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of bruton v. united states, 391 u.s. 123 . see roberts v. russell, ante, p. 293. mr. justice harlan and mr. justice white dissent for the reasons stated in mr. justice white's dissenting opinion in bruton v. united states, 391 u.s. 123, 138 (1968). page 392 u.s. 306, 307

Full Judgment

WILLIAMS v. FLORIDA - 392 U.S. 306 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court WILLIAMS v. FLORIDA, 392 U.S. 306 (1968) 392 U.S. 306

WILLIAMS v. FLORIDA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF
FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT. No. 279, Misc.
Decided June 10, 1968.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Wallace E. Allbritton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 . See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE WHITE'S dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138 (1968).

Page 392 U.S. 306, 307



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial