Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Serio Vs. United States

Serio vs United States

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-10-1968
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101962

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
392 U.S. 305
Subject
Direct Taxation

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Direct Taxation

Key legal issue
Direct Taxation

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Serio

Respondent

United States

Excerpt

serio v. united states - 392 u.s. 305 (1968) u.s. supreme court serio v. united states, 392 u.s. 305 (1968) 392 u.s. 305 serio v. united states. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit. no. 200, misc. decided june 10, 1968. certiorari granted; 126 u.s. app. d.c. 297, 377 f.2d 936 , vacated and remanded. solicitor general marshall, assistant attorney general vinson, beatrice rosenberg, and paul c. summitt for the united states. per curiam. the motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment of the united states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of bruton v. united states, 391 u.s. 123 . see roberts v. russell, ante, p. 293. mr. justice black dissents. mr. justice harlan and mr. justice white dissent for the reasons stated in mr. justice white's dissenting opinion in bruton v. united states, 391 u.s. 123, 138 (1968). mr. justice marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 392 u.s. 305, 306

Full Judgment

SERIO v. UNITED STATES - 392 U.S. 305 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court SERIO v. UNITED STATES, 392 U.S. 305 (1968) 392 U.S. 305

SERIO v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 200, Misc.
Decided June 10, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 126 U.S. App. D.C. 297, 377 F.2d 936 , vacated and remanded.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Paul C. Summitt for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 . See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE WHITE'S dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138 (1968).

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 392 U.S. 305, 306



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial