Hunt Vs. Connecticut

Hunt vs Connecticut

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-10-1968

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101961

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/101961
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jun-10-1968
Case Number: 392 U.S. 304
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hunt

Respondent

Connecticut

Excerpt

hunt v. connecticut - 392 u.s. 304 (1968) u.s. supreme court hunt v. connecticut, 392 u.s. 304 (1968) 392 u.s. 304 hunt v. connecticut. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of connecticut. no. 117, misc. decided june 10, 1968. certiorari granted; 154 conn. 517, 227 a. 2d 69, vacated and remanded. james w. marshall for petitioner. david b. salzman for respondent. per curiam. the motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment of the supreme court of connecticut is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of bruton v. united states, 391 u.s. 123 . see roberts v. russell, ante, p. 293. mr. justice black dissents. mr. justice harlan and mr. justice white dissent for the reasons stated in mr. justice white's dissenting opinion in bruton v. united states, 391 u.s. 123, 138 (1968). page 392 u.s. 304, 305

Full Judgment

HUNT v. CONNECTICUT - 392 U.S. 304 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court HUNT v. CONNECTICUT, 392 U.S. 304 (1968) 392 U.S. 304

HUNT v. CONNECTICUT.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT.
No. 117, Misc.
Decided June 10, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 154 Conn. 517, 227 A. 2d 69, vacated and remanded.

James W. Marshall for petitioner.

David B. Salzman for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Connecticut is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 . See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE WHITE'S dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138 (1968).

Page 392 U.S. 304, 305

Same Parties Hunt vs Connecticut Same Subject Land Acquisition