Taggart Vs. New York

Taggart vs New York

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-17-1968

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101939

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/101939
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jun-17-1968
Case Number: 392 U.S. 667
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Taggart

Respondent

New York

Excerpt

taggart v. new york - 392 u.s. 667 (1968) u.s. supreme court taggart v. new york, 392 u.s. 667 (1968) 392 u.s. 667 taggart v. new york. appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 1668, misc. decided june 17, 1968. 20 n. y. 2d 335, 229 n. e. 2d 581; 21 n. y. 2d 729, 234 n. e. 2d 714, appeal dismissed. leon b. polsky for appellant. thomas j. mackell and peter j. o'connor for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for failure to file the notice of appeal within the time provided by rule 11. mr. justice black is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice douglas dissents. page 392 u.s. 667, 1

Full Judgment

TAGGART v. NEW YORK - 392 U.S. 667 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court TAGGART v. NEW YORK, 392 U.S. 667 (1968) 392 U.S. 667

TAGGART v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 1668, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1968.

20 N. Y. 2d 335, 229 N. E. 2d 581; 21 N. Y. 2d 729, 234 N. E. 2d 714, appeal dismissed.

Leon B. Polsky for appellant.

Thomas J. Mackell and Peter J. O'Connor for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for failure to file the notice of appeal within the time provided by Rule 11.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents.

Page 392 U.S. 667, 1

Same Parties Taggart vs New York Same Subject Land Acquisition