Carroll Vs. Texas

Carroll vs Texas

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-17-1968

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101936

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/101936
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jun-17-1968
Case Number: 392 U.S. 664
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Carroll

Respondent

Texas

Excerpt

carroll v. texas - 392 u.s. 664 (1968) u.s. supreme court carroll v. texas, 392 u.s. 664 (1968) 392 u.s. 664 carroll v. texas. on petition for writ of certiorari to the court of criminal appeals of texas. no. 1224, misc. decided june 17, 1968. certiorari granted; reversed. don gladden and sam houston clinton, jr., for petitioner. crawford c. martin, attorney general of texas, and howard m. fender, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is reversed. rideau v. louisiana, 373 u.s. 723 . the chief justice, mr. justice harlan, mr. justice stewart, and mr. justice white are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied. page 392 u.s. 664, 665

Full Judgment

CARROLL v. TEXAS - 392 U.S. 664 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court CARROLL v. TEXAS, 392 U.S. 664 (1968) 392 U.S. 664

CARROLL v. TEXAS.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS. No. 1224, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1968.

Certiorari granted; reversed.

Don Gladden and Sam Houston Clinton, Jr., for petitioner.

Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, and Howard M. Fender, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Rideau v. Louisiana, 373 U.S. 723 .

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, MR. JUSTICE STEWART, and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.

Page 392 U.S. 664, 665

Same Parties Carroll vs Texas Same Subject Education