West Vs. California

West vs California

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-17-1968

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101935

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/101935
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jun-17-1968
Case Number: 392 U.S. 663
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

West

Respondent

California

Excerpt

west v. california - 392 u.s. 663 (1968) u.s. supreme court west v. california, 392 u.s. 663 (1968) 392 u.s. 663 west v. california. on petition for writ of certiorari to the court of appeal of california, fourth appellate district. no. 1127, misc. decided june 17, 1968. certiorari granted; 253 cal. app. 2d 348, 61 cal. rptr. 216, vacated and remanded. william a. dougherty for petitioner. thomas c. lynch, attorney general of california, william e. james, assistant attorney general, and richard d. huffman, deputy attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for a hearing as provided in sims v. georgia, 385 u.s. 538 , and jackson v. denno, 378 u.s. 368 . mr. justice douglas is of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be granted and the case set for oral argument. page 392 u.s. 663, 664

Full Judgment

WEST v. CALIFORNIA - 392 U.S. 663 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court WEST v. CALIFORNIA, 392 U.S. 663 (1968) 392 U.S. 663

WEST v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA,
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 1127, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 253 Cal. App. 2d 348, 61 Cal. Rptr. 216, vacated and remanded.

William A. Dougherty for petitioner.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Richard D. Huffman, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for a hearing as provided in Sims v. Georgia, 385 U.S. 538 , and Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368 .

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be granted and the case set for oral argument.

Page 392 U.S. 663, 664

Same Parties West vs California Same Subject Land Acquisition