Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Wheat Vs. Washington

Wheat vs Washington

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-17-1968
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101924

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
392 U.S. 652
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Wheat

Respondent

Washington

Excerpt

wheat v. washington - 392 u.s. 652 (1968) u.s. supreme court wheat v. washington, 392 u.s. 652 (1968) 392 u.s. 652 wheat v. washington. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of washington. no. 1301, misc. decided june 17, 1968. * [ footnote * ] together with no. 1535, misc., aiken v. washington, also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same court. certiorari granted; 72 wash. 2d 306, 434 p.2d 10, vacated and remanded. charles m. stokes for petitioner in no. 1301, misc. anthony savage, jr., for petitioner in no. 1535, misc. james e. kennedy for respondent in both cases. per curiam. the motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. the judgments of the supreme court of washington are vacated and the cases remanded to that court for reconsideration in the light of bruton v. united states, 391 u.s. 123 , and witherspoon v. illinois, 391 u.s. 510 . mr. justice black dissents. mr. justice harlan dissents for the reasons stated in mr. justice black's dissenting opinion in witherspoon v. illinois, 391 u.s. 510, 532 , and mr. justice white's dissenting opinion in bruton v. united states, 391 u.s. 123, 138 . mr. justice white dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinions in witherspoon v. illinois, 391 u.s. 510, 540 , and bruton v. united states, 391 u.s. 123, 138 . page 392 u.s. 652, 653

Full Judgment

WHEAT v. WASHINGTON - 392 U.S. 652 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court WHEAT v. WASHINGTON, 392 U.S. 652 (1968) 392 U.S. 652

WHEAT v. WASHINGTON.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 1301, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1968. *

[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 1535, Misc., Aiken v. Washington, also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same court.

Certiorari granted; 72 Wash. 2d 306, 434 P.2d 10, vacated and remanded.

Charles M. Stokes for petitioner in No. 1301, Misc. Anthony Savage, Jr., for petitioner in No. 1535, Misc.

James E. Kennedy for respondent in both cases.

PER CURIAM.

The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments of the Supreme Court of Washington are vacated and the cases remanded to that court for reconsideration in the light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 , and Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 .

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissents for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE BLACK's dissenting opinion in Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, 532 , and MR. JUSTICE WHITE's dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138 .

MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinions in Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, 540 , and Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138 .

Page 392 U.S. 652, 653



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial