Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pope Vs. United States

Pope vs United States

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-17-1968
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101923

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
392 U.S. 651
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pope

Respondent

United States

Excerpt

pope v. united states - 392 u.s. 651 (1968) u.s. supreme court pope v. united states, 392 u.s. 651 (1968) 392 u.s. 651 pope v. united states. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eighth circuit. no. 34, misc. decided june 17, 1968. certiorari granted; 372 f.2d 710 , vacated and remanded. wallace m. rudolph for petitioner. solicitor general griswold, assistant attorney general vinson, ralph s. spritzer, beatrice rosenberg, and jerome m. feit for the united states. per curiam. the petitioner was convicted by a jury and sentenced to death under the federal bank robbery act, 18 u.s.c. 2113 (e). the solicitor general has filed a memorandum for the united states conceding that this death penalty provision "suffers from the same constitutional infirmity" as that found in the federal kidnaping act, 18 u.s.c. 1201 (a). united states v. jackson, 390 u.s. 570 . accordingly, the solicitor general concedes that the petitioner's "sentence must be vacated and the cause remanded . . . for resentencing." in light of this concession and upon an independent examination of the record, but without reaching any of the petitioner's other claims, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the united states court of appeals for the eighth circuit for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. mr. justice black and mr. justice white dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of mr. justice white in united states v. jackson, 390 u.s. 570, 591 . mr. justice black dissents for the further reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in lopinson v. pennsylvania, ante, p. 648. page 392 u.s. 651, 652

Full Judgment

POPE v. UNITED STATES - 392 U.S. 651 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court POPE v. UNITED STATES, 392 U.S. 651 (1968) 392 U.S. 651

POPE v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 34, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 372 F.2d 710 , vacated and remanded.

Wallace M. Rudolph for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Ralph S. Spritzer, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Jerome M. Feit for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner was convicted by a jury and sentenced to death under the Federal Bank Robbery Act, 18 U.S.C. 2113 (e). The Solicitor General has filed a memorandum for the United States conceding that this death penalty provision "suffers from the same constitutional infirmity" as that found in the Federal Kidnaping Act, 18 U.S.C. 1201 (a). United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 . Accordingly, the Solicitor General concedes that the petitioner's "sentence must be vacated and the cause remanded . . . for resentencing." In light of this concession and upon an independent examination of the record, but without reaching any of the petitioner's other claims, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of MR. JUSTICE WHITE in United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570, 591 .

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents for the further reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Lopinson v. Pennsylvania, ante, p. 648.

Page 392 U.S. 651, 652



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial