Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bhagirathi Prasad Dey Vs. Human Resource Development

Bhagirathi Prasad Dey vs Human Resource Development

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 30, 2013
~5 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1019015

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bhagirathi Prasad Dey

Respondent

Human Resource Development

Excerpt

.....in i. a. no. 4107 of 2013, the petitioner has prayed for disposal of w.p.(s) no. 2005 of 2013 in terms of the order dated 15.9.2011 passed in w.p.(s) no. 5658 of 2009 [om prakash gope vs. state of jharkhand & ors.]. it has been submitted that the facts and the issue in the instant case are almost similar to the case of om prakash gope (supra) and the same may be disposed of in terms of the order passed in the said case. learned j.c. to g.p-iii, appearing on behalf of the respondents, has accepted the said position and submitted that the writ petition can be disposed of in terms of the order passed in om prakash gope (supra). in the writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction on the respondents to take decision regarding approval / recognition of the services of the petitioner as assistant teacher in project girls high school, kharsawan, as has been done in the cases of other similarly situated persons. the petitioner has also prayed for a direction on the respondents to pay salary and other consequential benefits to the petitioner from 1.1.1989 like other similarly situated persons. it has been stated that the petitioner was appointed as assistant teacher by the managing committee in the said school on 6.1.1984. the petitioner subsequently completed teachers training from sister nivedita college at kolkata in 1993. in the year 1984-85, the government had decided to take over 300 project girls' high schools. the petitioner's school was also taken over in 1985. for the purpose of regularization / approval of the services of the teachers and non-teaching staffs of those schools, three men committee was constituted. the three men committee scrutinized the services of the teachers of the school for the purpose of approval, but the petitioner's service was not approved, for the reason that the petitioner got teachers training from the college, which was not recognized under the provisions of national council for teachers education act,1993 ('ncte.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 2005 of 2013 With I. A. No. 4107 of 2013 Bhagirathi Prasad Dey .. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others .. Respondents ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ----- For the Petitioner - Mrs. Shubha Jha For the Respondents - Mr. J.C to G.P-III ----- 4/30.7.2013 In I. A. No. 4107 of 2013, the petitioner has prayed for disposal of W.P.(S) No. 2005 of 2013 in terms of the order dated 15.9.2011 passed in W.P.(S) No. 5658 of 2009 [Om Prakash Gope Vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors.]. It has been submitted that the facts and the issue in the instant case are almost similar to the case of Om Prakash Gope (supra) and the same may be disposed of in terms of the order passed in the said case. Learned J.C. to G.P-III, appearing on behalf of the respondents, has accepted the said position and submitted that the writ petition can be disposed of in terms of the order passed in Om Prakash Gope (supra). In the writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction on the respondents to take decision regarding approval / recognition of the services of the petitioner as Assistant Teacher in Project Girls High School, Kharsawan, as has been done in the cases of other similarly situated persons. The petitioner has also prayed for a direction on the respondents to pay salary and other consequential benefits to the petitioner from 1.1.1989 like other similarly situated persons. It has been stated that the petitioner was appointed as Assistant Teacher by the Managing Committee in the said school on 6.1.1984. The petitioner subsequently completed teachers training from Sister Nivedita College at Kolkata in 1993. In the year 1984-85, the Government had decided to take over 300 Project Girls' High Schools. The petitioner's School was also taken over in 1985. For the purpose of regularization / approval of the services of the teachers and non-teaching staffs of those Schools, Three Men Committee was constituted. The Three Men Committee scrutinized the services of the teachers of the school for the purpose of approval, but the petitioner's service was not approved, for the reason that the petitioner got teachers training from the college, which was not recognized under the provisions of National Council for Teachers Education Act,1993 ('NCTE Act,1993' for short). Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner got his teachers training certificate in 1993, whereas NCTE Act,1993 came into force from July,1995. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that admittedly NCTE Act was not in existence when the petitioner had got teachers training from Sister Nivedita College, Kolkata and there was no defect in his training certificate. She further submitted that the petitioner was duly appointed by the Managing Committee and he has all eligibility and qualification for being appointed as Assistant Teacher in the High School. Denial of recommendation for approval of Three Men Committee is, therefore, arbitrary and discriminatory. Learned counsel submitted that services of one Om Prakash Gope was also not regularized for the same reason that he had got training certificate from the said College in 1994 i.e. Sister Nivedita College at Kolkata, which was not recognized by the NCTE. The said Om Prakash Gope being aggrieved by the denial of approval of the Three Men Committee, had filed writ petition being W.P.(S) No. 5658 of 2009. This Court after hearing the parties at length and considering all the relevant aspects held that since the petitioner had cleared his teachers training certificate examination on 16th March,1994, prior to enforcement of the Act,1993 in July,1995, denial of the petitioner's recommendation by Three Men Committee was arbitrary. The report was quashed and the respondents were directed to recognize the services of the petitioner and pass necessary order to that effect. The petitioner was also held entitled for all consequential benefits including salary. Learned J.C. to G.P.VI, appearing on behalf of the respondents, admitted that the case of the petitioner is covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Om Prakash Gope (supra). The petitioner has also completed his training from Sister Nivedita College, Kolkata prior to coming into force of the said NCTE Act,1993 and that the writ petition can be disposed of in terms of the said order. Considering the said submissions and the facts and circumstances, this writ petition as well as I. A. No. 4107 of 2013 are disposed of in the light of the order dated 15.9.2011 passed in Om Prakash Gope (supra) quashing the refusal of petitioner's recommendation by Three Men Committee (Annexure-3) and directing the respondent No.2, who is said to be the competent authority, to issue appropriate order recognizing the services of the petitioner as Assistant Teacher in Project Girls High School, Kharsawan and pay all consequential benefits including arrears of his salary, within six weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order. If the admitted amount / arrears is not paid within the said period, the petitioner shall be entitled to get interest @ 10% per annum from the date the amount found payable till the date of final payment. S.K (NARENDRA NATH TIWARI, J)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial