Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Chinthamani Vs. Secretary

Chinthamani vs Secretary

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 09, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1018494

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Chinthamani

Respondent

Secretary

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice a.m.shaffique tuesday,the 9th day of july 2013 18th ashadha, 1935 wp(c).no. 17141 of 2013 (p) ---------------------------- petitioner : -------------------------- chinthamani, aged 5 years, w/o.late balakrishnan nair, krishna nivas, ekarool, unnikulam, kozhikode. by adv. sri.m.jithesh menon respondent : ---------------------------- the secretary, regional transport authority, kozhikode. by sr government pleader sri.p.m.saneer this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 09-07-2013, the court on the same day delivered the following: sts wp(c).no. 17141 of 2013 (p) ---------------------------------------- appendix petitioner(s)' exhibits: ------------------------------------- ext.p1 true copy of the order of the respondent dated 4 4-2013 ext.p2 true copy of the previous timings of kl-56/c 388.dated 19 03-2011 ext.p3 true copy of the present timings of kl-56/c 388.dated 9 5-2013 ext.p4 true copy of the request with the proposed timings submitted by the petitioners dated 11 06-2013 respondent(s)' exhibits: nil /true copy/ p.s.to.judge sts a.m.shaffique, j * * * * * * * * * * * * * w.p.c.no.17141 of 2013 ---------------------------------------- dated this the 9th day of july 2013 judgment the petitioner has filed ext.p4 request for change of timings which was fixed only on 04/04/2013. i am not inclined to direct consideration of ext.p4 at this point of time and the hence the writ petition is dismissed. (sd/-) (a.m.shaffique, judge) jsr w.p.c..no.17141/2013 2 w.p.c..no.17141/2013 3

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE TUESDAY,THE 9TH DAY OF JULY 2013 18TH ASHADHA, 1935 WP(C).No. 17141 of 2013 (P) ---------------------------- PETITIONER : -------------------------- CHINTHAMANI, AGED 5 YEARS, W/O.LATE BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, KRISHNA NIVAS, EKAROOL, UNNIKULAM, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.M.JITHESH MENON RESPONDENT : ---------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE. BY SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.M.SANEER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-07-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C).No. 17141 of 2013 (P) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS: ------------------------------------- EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE RESPONDENT DATED 4 4-2013 EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE PREVIOUS TIMINGS OF KL-56/C 388.DATED 19 03-2011 EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE PRESENT TIMINGS OF KL-56/C 388.DATED 9 5-2013 EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST WITH THE PROPOSED TIMINGS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS DATED 11 06-2013 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO.JUDGE sts A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J * * * * * * * * * * * * * W.P.C.No.17141 of 2013 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of July 2013 JUDGMENT

The petitioner has filed Ext.P4 request for change of timings which was fixed only on 04/04/2013. I am not inclined to direct consideration of Ext.P4 at this point of time and the hence the writ petition is dismissed. (sd/-) (A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE) jsr W.P.C..No.17141/2013 2 W.P.C..No.17141/2013 3

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial