Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Leejamol Vs. Jaison

Leejamol vs Jaison

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 31, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1017881

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Leejamol

Respondent

Jaison

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice p.n.ravindran wednesday, the 31st day of july 2013 9th sravana, 1935 tr.p(c).no. 530 of 2012 --------------------------- op(div) 1295/2009 of family court,kollam petitioner: leejamol, d/o.cherian, meppurathu house, madanthaman athikkayam village, ranni taluk pathanamthitta district. by adv. sri.r.gireesh varma respondent: jaison, s/o.samuel, palli vadakkethil house chamavila padinjattathil, mukkood.p.o, mulavana kollam-691503. r1 by adv. smt.m.lalitha nair this transfer petition (civil) having come up for admission on 31-07-2013, the court on the same day passed the following: tpc 530/2012 petitioner's amnnxures: annexure a111; true copy of the petition in o.p.(div) 1295/2009 on the files of family court, kollam. annexure-a2: true copy of the petition in o.p.(no. 163/2012 on the files of the family court at thiruvalla. ks. true copy p.s. to judge p.n.ravindran, j.=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= tr.p.(c)no.530 of 2012 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= dated this the 31st day of july, 2013 order when this transfer petition came up for hearing today, sri.r.gireesh varma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the transfer petition, reserving liberty with the petitioner to file a fresh transfer petition after impleading the second respondent in o.p.(div.)no.1295 of 2009 as a respondent in the transfer petition. the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that due to oversight, the second respondent in o.p.(div.)no.1295 of 2009 was not joined as a party. leave granted as prayed for and the transfer petition is dismissed as withdrawn, reserving liberty with the petitioner to file a fresh petition for transfer with proper persons on the party array. sd/- p.n.ravindran judge /true copy/ p.a. to judge vpv

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JULY 2013 9TH SRAVANA, 1935 Tr.P(C).No. 530 of 2012 --------------------------- OP(DIV) 1295/2009 of FAMILY COURT,KOLLAM PETITIONER: LEEJAMOL, D/O.CHERIAN, MEPPURATHU HOUSE, MADANTHAMAN ATHIKKAYAM VILLAGE, RANNI TALUK PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.R.GIREESH VARMA RESPONDENT: JAISON, S/O.SAMUEL, PALLI VADAKKETHIL HOUSE CHAMAVILA PADINJATTATHIL, MUKKOOD.P.O, MULAVANA KOLLAM-691503. R1 BY ADV. SMT.M.LALITHA NAIR THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31-07-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: TPC 530/2012 PETITIONER'S AMNNXURES: ANNEXURE A111; true copy of the petition in o.p.(div) 1295/2009 on the files of family court, kollam. Annexure-A2: TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION IN O.P.(NO. 163/2012 ON THE FILES OF THE FAMILY COURT AT THIRUVALLA. ks. TRUE COPY P.S. TO JUDGE P.N.RAVINDRAN, J.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Tr.P.(C)No.530 of 2012 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this the 31st day of July, 2013 ORDER When this transfer petition came up for hearing today, Sri.R.Gireesh Varma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the transfer petition, reserving liberty with the petitioner to file a fresh transfer petition after impleading the second respondent in O.P.(Div.)No.1295 of 2009 as a respondent in the transfer petition. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that due to oversight, the second respondent in O.P.(Div.)No.1295 of 2009 was not joined as a party. Leave granted as prayed for and the transfer petition is dismissed as withdrawn, reserving liberty with the petitioner to file a fresh petition for transfer with proper persons on the party array. Sd/- P.N.RAVINDRAN JUDGE /true copy/ P.A. To Judge VPV

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial