Fathima Beevi Vs. K.S.E.B

Fathima Beevi vs K.S.E.B

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 31, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1017855

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1017855
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice Thomas P.Joseph
Decided On: Jul 31, 2013
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Fathima Beevi

Respondent

K.S.E.B

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice thomas p.joseph wednesday, the 31st day of july 2013 9th sravana, 1935 rfa.no. 606 of 2004 ( ) ------------------------ the order/judgment in os 131/1993 of sub court, mavelikkara dated 20 12-2002 appellants/plaintiffs 1 to 3.5 and 7.------------------------------------- 1. fathima beevi, w/o.late aliyarukunju, r/a. parayanvilla puthen veedu, venga, minagappally sasthamkotta taluk (died) 2. taha kunju, parayan villa puthen veedu, minagappally village, sasthamcotta.3. sauda beevi, parayanvilla puthen veedu, minagappally village, sasthamcotta.4. shahida beevi, parayanvilla puthen veedu, minagappally village, sasthamkotta.5. lila beevi, parayanvila puthen veedu, minagappally village, sasthamcotta. by advs.sri.k.k.chandran pillai sri.sudheesh.a. respondent(s)/defendants 1 3 to 5 and plaintiffs 4 and 6.---------------------------------------------------- 1. kerala state electricity board, rep. by its secretary, vaidyuthi bhavan, pattom thiruvananthapuram.2. rema, undathu madathil, keezhcherimel muri, chengannur.3. jyothi lakshmi, undathu madathil, keezhcherimel muri, chengannur.4. rajalakshmi, undathu madathil, keezhcherimel muri, chengannur.5. mohammed shafi, parayanvilla puthen veedu, minagappally village, sasthamkotta.6. mohammed quashsi, parayanvilla puthen veedu, minagappally village, sasthamkotta. adv. sri. p santhalingam for r1 this regular first appeal having been finally heard on 31.07-2013, the court on the same day delivered the following: thomas p.joseph, j.========================= r.f.a.no.606 of 2004 ============================ dated this the 31st day of july, 2013 judgment the defect in the appeal is not cured. steps are not taken to issue notice to the respondents 2 to 4.2. this appeal was preferred on 15.05.2004. in spite of granting sufficient opportunity the appellants have not cured the defect.3. learned counsel for the appellants submits that in spite of giving intimation.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JULY 2013 9TH SRAVANA, 1935 RFA.No. 606 of 2004 ( ) ------------------------ THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 131/1993 of SUB COURT, MAVELIKKARA DATED 20 12-2002 APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS 1 TO 3.5 AND 7.------------------------------------- 1. FATHIMA BEEVI, W/O.LATE ALIYARUKUNJU, R/A. PARAYANVILLA PUTHEN VEEDU, VENGA, MINAGAPPALLY SASTHAMKOTTA TALUK (DIED) 2. TAHA KUNJU, PARAYAN VILLA PUTHEN VEEDU, MINAGAPPALLY VILLAGE, SASTHAMCOTTA.

3. SAUDA BEEVI, PARAYANVILLA PUTHEN VEEDU, MINAGAPPALLY VILLAGE, SASTHAMCOTTA.

4. SHAHIDA BEEVI, PARAYANVILLA PUTHEN VEEDU, MINAGAPPALLY VILLAGE, SASTHAMKOTTA.

5. LILA BEEVI, PARAYANVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, MINAGAPPALLY VILLAGE, SASTHAMCOTTA. BY ADVS.SRI.K.K.CHANDRAN PILLAI SRI.SUDHEESH.A. RESPONDENT(S)/DEFENDANTS 1 3 TO 5 AND PLAINTIFFS 4 AND 6.---------------------------------------------------- 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, VAIDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. REMA, UNDATHU MADATHIL, KEEZHCHERIMEL MURI, CHENGANNUR.

3. JYOTHI LAKSHMI, UNDATHU MADATHIL, KEEZHCHERIMEL MURI, CHENGANNUR.

4. RAJALAKSHMI, UNDATHU MADATHIL, KEEZHCHERIMEL MURI, CHENGANNUR.

5. MOHAMMED SHAFI, PARAYANVILLA PUTHEN VEEDU, MINAGAPPALLY VILLAGE, SASTHAMKOTTA.

6. MOHAMMED QUASHSI, PARAYANVILLA PUTHEN VEEDU, MINAGAPPALLY VILLAGE, SASTHAMKOTTA. ADV. SRI. P SANTHALINGAM FOR R1 THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31.07-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J.

========================= R.F.A.No.606 of 2004 ============================ Dated this the 31st day of July, 2013 JUDGMENT

The defect in the appeal is not cured. Steps are not taken to issue notice to the respondents 2 to 4.

2. This appeal was preferred on 15.05.2004. In spite of granting sufficient opportunity the appellants have not cured the defect.

3. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that in spite of giving intimation to the appellants vide two letters, the appellants have not responded.

4. It is clear that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No cost. All pending interlocutory applications will stand dismissed. Sd/- THOMAS P.JOSEPH, JUDGE Sbna True Copy P.A to Judge

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2013 Same Parties Fathima Beevi vs K.S.E.B Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice Thomas P.Joseph