Badarudeen Vs. Devarajan

Badarudeen vs Devarajan

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 31, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1017825

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1017825
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan
Decided On: Jul 31, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Badarudeen

Respondent

Devarajan

Excerpt

.....road, alwaye). r1 by advs. sri.thomas abraham sri.dipu.r smt.merciamma mathew sri.k.s.haridas sri.v.renjith kumar this regular first appeal having been finally heard on 31-07-2013, the court on the same day delivered the following: tss r.f.a. no.53/2009 appendix appellant's annexures a:- copy of registration card issued from the hospital. b:- copy of discharge summary issued from the hospital. c:- copy of prescription note issued from hospital. respondent's annexures nil true copy p.a. to judge tss thottathil b.radhakrishnan & babu mathew p.joseph, jj..................................................................... c.m.appln.no.133 of 2009 & rfa no.53 of 2009 .................................................................... dated this the 31st day of july, 2013. judgmentthottathil b.radhakrishnan, j.read order dated 02.07.2010 on c.m.appln.no.133 of 2009 and order dated 28.01.2011 in r.p.no.78 of 2011. the office has endorsed that memo regarding payment of costs has not been received so far. the learned counsel for the respondent says that costs has not been paid. under such circumstances, the application for condonation of delay will stand dismissed by efflux of time on ground of non-payment of costs. resultantly, the appeal is rejected. refund the court fee paid to the appellant, through his learned counsel. (thottathil b.radhakrishnan, judge) (babu mathew p. joseph, judge) jg

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JULY 2013 9TH SRAVANA, 1935 RFA.No. 53 of 2009 ( ) ------------------------------- OS 127/2004 of PRL.SUB COURT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ...... APPELLANT(S):(DEFENDANT IN THE COURT BELOW) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BADARUDEEN, S/O. MOHAMMED MUSTAFFA, VAYALANIKATHIYA PUTHEN VEEDU, T.C.NO. 38/1375 POWER HOUSE ROAD, THYCAUD VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.B.PRADEEP RESPONDENT(S):(PLAINTIFF IN THE COURT BELOW) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DEVARAJAN, ARIPADASSERI HOUSE, KAMALESWARAM, MANACAUD VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. (REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, AS IN THE TRIAL COURT, SMT.PREMAKUMARI, D/O. LEKSHMIKUTTY, NOW RESIDING AT POLICE QUARTERS NO.9, POWER HOUSE ROAD, ALWAYE). R1 BY ADVS. SRI.THOMAS ABRAHAM SRI.DIPU.R SMT.MERCIAMMA MATHEW SRI.K.S.HARIDAS SRI.V.RENJITH KUMAR THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31-07-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss R.F.A. NO.53/2009 APPENDIX APPELLANT'S ANNEXURES A:- COPY OF REGISTRATION CARD ISSUED FROM THE HOSPITAL. B:- COPY OF DISCHARGE SUMMARY ISSUED FROM THE HOSPITAL. C:- COPY OF PRESCRIPTION NOTE ISSUED FROM HOSPITAL. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES NIL TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH, JJ.

.................................................................... C.M.Appln.No.133 of 2009 & RFA No.53 of 2009 .................................................................... Dated this the 31st day of July, 2013. JUDGMENT

Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J.

Read order dated 02.07.2010 on C.M.Appln.No.133 of 2009 and order dated 28.01.2011 in R.P.No.78 of 2011. The Office has endorsed that memo regarding payment of costs has not been received so far. The learned counsel for the respondent says that costs has not been paid. Under such circumstances, the application for condonation of delay will stand dismissed by efflux of time on ground of non-payment of costs. Resultantly, the appeal is rejected. Refund the court fee paid to the appellant, through his learned counsel. (THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE) (BABU MATHEW P. JOSEPH, JUDGE) jg

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2013 Same Parties Badarudeen vs Devarajan Same Subject Education Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan