Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rahul Vs. State of Kerala

Rahul vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 31, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1017820

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rahul

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr. justice harun-ul-rashid wednesday, the 31st day of july2013/9th sravana, 1935 crl.a. no. 907 of 2012 () ------------------------- against the judgment in sc no. 193/2010 of additional district court (adhoc), thrissur dated 14 06-2010 appellants/accused 1 and 3.----------------------------------------------- 1. rahul s/o. raju, kaduvayi kunnath (house), 16 mile vengadum junction, pothankode, thiruvananthapuram.2. deepu @ thonnakkal deepu, s/o .bhoovanachandran, deepa mandiram, kannarkonam thonnackal, thiruvananthapuram. by advs. sri. m.h. hanil kumar sri. m.r. dhanil respondent/complainant/state: ----------------------------------------------------- state of kerala represented by s.i. of police thrissur west police station represented by public prosecutor high court of kerala. by government pleader smt. sareena george this criminal appeal having been finally heard on 31-07-2013, the court on the same day delivered the following: sp harun-ul-rashid, j.---------------------------------- crl. appeal no:907 of 2012 ---------------------------------- dated this the 31st day of july, 2013 judgment the appeal was preferred against the judgment dated 14.06.2010 of the additional district & sessions judge (fast track court-i), thrissur in sessions case no:193/2010. the appellants are accused nos.1 and 3. the very same appellants preferred crl. appeal no.1394/2010 challenging the very same judgment through another counsel. the counsel who filed crl. appeal no.907/2012 has relinquished his engagement. there is no necessity to prosecute two appeals by very same persons challenging the very same judgment. criminal appeal no.907/2012 is dismissed. harun-ul-rashid judge sp

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JULY2013/9TH SRAVANA, 1935 CRL.A. No. 907 of 2012 () ------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN SC NO. 193/2010 of ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT (ADHOC), THRISSUR DATED 14 06-2010 APPELLANTS/ACCUSED 1 AND 3.----------------------------------------------- 1. RAHUL S/O. RAJU, KADUVAYI KUNNATH (HOUSE), 16 MILE VENGADUM JUNCTION, POTHANKODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. DEEPU @ THONNAKKAL DEEPU, S/O .BHOOVANACHANDRAN, DEEPA MANDIRAM, KANNARKONAM THONNACKAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS. SRI. M.H. HANIL KUMAR SRI. M.R. DHANIL RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT/STATE: ----------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY S.I. OF POLICE THRISSUR WEST POLICE STATION REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SAREENA GEORGE THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31-07-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sp HARUN-UL-RASHID, J.

---------------------------------- Crl. Appeal No:907 of 2012 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 31st day of July, 2013 JUDGMENT The appeal was preferred against the judgment dated 14.06.2010 of the Additional District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court-I), Thrissur in Sessions Case No:193/2010. The appellants are accused Nos.1 and 3. The very same appellants preferred Crl. Appeal No.1394/2010 challenging the very same judgment through another counsel. The counsel who filed Crl. Appeal No.907/2012 has relinquished his engagement. There is no necessity to prosecute two appeals by very same persons challenging the very same judgment. Criminal Appeal No.907/2012 is dismissed. HARUN-UL-RASHID JUDGE sp

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial