Kimbro Vs. Heer

Kimbro vs Heer

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Feb-20-1967

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101769

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/101769
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Feb-20-1967
Case Number: 386 U.S. 128
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kimbro

Respondent

Heer

Excerpt

kimbro v. heer - 386 u.s. 128 (1967) u.s. supreme court reports kimbro v. heer, 386 u.s. 128 (1967) kimbro v. heer, 386 u.s. 128 (1967) 386 u.s. 128 kimbro v. heer, warden. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the sixth circuit. no. 751, misc. decided february 20, 1967. certiorari granted; 364 f.2d 116 , vacated and remanded. petitioner pro se. george f. mccanless, attorney general of tennessee, and henry c. foutch and paul e. jennings, assistant attorneys general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the united states district court for the middle district of tennessee, for a hearing. townsend v. sain, 372 u.s. 293 . mr. justice stewart is of the opinion that certiorari should be denied. page 386 u.s. 128, 129

Full Judgment

KIMBRO v. HEER - 386 U.S. 128 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court Reports KIMBRO v. HEER, 386 U.S. 128 (1967) KIMBRO v. HEER, 386 U.S. 128 (1967) 386 U.S. 128

KIMBRO v. HEER, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 751, Misc.
Decided February 20, 1967.

Certiorari granted; 364 F.2d 116 , vacated and remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Henry C. Foutch and Paul E. Jennings, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, for a hearing. Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293 .

MR. JUSTICE STEWART is of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.

Page 386 U.S. 128, 129

Same Parties Kimbro vs Heer Same Subject Land Acquisition