Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rameswary Vs. Binukumar

Rameswary vs Binukumar

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 15, 2013
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1017401

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rameswary

Respondent

Binukumar

Excerpt

.....exhibits --------------------------------------- nil // true copy // p.a. to judge sou. p.bhavadasan, j.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - crl.m.c. no. 2882 of 201.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - dated this the 15th day of july, 2013. order the petitioner is none other than the defacto complainant on whose complaint crime no.905 of 2010 of vanchiyoor police station was registered against the accused who is the respondent herein for the offences punishable under sections 376 and 417 of indian penal code.2. the defacto complainant appears through a counsel and filed an affidavit to the effect that she withdraws all the allegations against the accused and she does not wish to continue the proceedings. she says that she is married and leading a happy peaceful homely life and she does not wish to proceed with the matter at all, in the interest of her marital life. she therefore prays that the matter may be given a quietus.3. though the offences alleged are not compoundable and the offence alleged is a serious one, crl.m.c. no. 2882 of 201.-2- since it is a personal matter and since the defacto complainant has herself approached this court seeking to have the matter closed, so that her family life may go smoothly, it becomes necessary for this court to consider the petition filed by the petitioner.4. since no public issue is involved and the matter is purely personal and since the defacto complainant says that she is married and she wishes to have a peaceful and happy married life and she does not want this to be a hindrance to the peaceful matrimonial life, it is felt that it will be only just and proper for this court to grant necessary relief to the petitioner. this petition is allowed. all further proceedings in c.p.no.41/2011 pending before the acjm court including final report shall stand quashed and the petitioner shall stand discharged. p.bhavadasan judge ds

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALAAT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN MONDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JULY2013/24TH ASHADHA, 1935 Crl.MC.No. 2882 of 2013 () --------------------------- CP 41/2011 of ADDL.CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT.,THIRUVANANDAPURAM CRIME NO. 905/2010 OF VANCHIYOOR POLICE STATION , THIRUVANANDAPURAM PETITIONER/DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT: --------------------------------------------------------- RAMESWARY D/O. POOMBAYAMMAL, KOTTAKKUMBOOR, VATTAVILA PANCHAYAT, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.G.SUDHEER RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED AND STATE: ----------------------------------------------------- 1. BINUKUMAR, S/O. RAVEENDRA BABU, SAMTHRUPTHI, EDAYAKKODU CHADAYAMANGALAM VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA.

2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERANAKULAM. R1 BY ADV.SRI.SHAJIN S.HAMEED R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. DHANESH MATHEW MANJOORAN THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-07-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Crl.MC.No. 2882 of 2013 () APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- ANNEXURE A- COPY OF FIR IN CRIME NO. 905/10. ANNEXURE B- COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT. ANNEXURE C- COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN IN BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE NOTARY PUBLIC. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE sou. P.BHAVADASAN, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.M.C. No. 2882 OF 201.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 15th day of July, 2013. ORDER

The petitioner is none other than the defacto complainant on whose complaint Crime No.905 of 2010 of Vanchiyoor Police Station was registered against the accused who is the respondent herein for the offences punishable under Sections 376 and 417 of Indian Penal Code.

2. The defacto complainant appears through a counsel and filed an affidavit to the effect that she withdraws all the allegations against the accused and she does not wish to continue the proceedings. She says that she is married and leading a happy peaceful homely life and she does not wish to proceed with the matter at all, in the interest of her marital life. She therefore prays that the matter may be given a quietus.

3. Though the offences alleged are not compoundable and the offence alleged is a serious one, Crl.M.C. No. 2882 OF 201.-2- since it is a personal matter and since the defacto complainant has herself approached this Court seeking to have the matter closed, so that her family life may go smoothly, it becomes necessary for this Court to consider the petition filed by the petitioner.

4. Since no public issue is involved and the matter is purely personal and since the defacto complainant says that she is married and she wishes to have a peaceful and happy married life and she does not want this to be a hindrance to the peaceful matrimonial life, it is felt that it will be only just and proper for this Court to grant necessary relief to the petitioner. This petition is allowed. All further proceedings in C.P.No.41/2011 pending before the ACJM Court including final report shall stand quashed and the petitioner shall stand discharged. P.BHAVADASAN JUDGE ds

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial