Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Connor Vs. Johnson

Connor vs Johnson

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-27-1967
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101724

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
386 U.S. 483
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Connor

Respondent

Johnson

Excerpt

connor v. johnson - 386 u.s. 483 (1967) u.s. supreme court reports connor v. johnson, 386 u.s. 483 (1967) connor v. johnson, 386 u.s. 483 (1967) 386 u.s. 483 connor et al. v. johnson, governor of mississippi, et al. appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of mississippi. no. 999. decided march 27, 1967. 265 f. supp. 492, î affirmed. [ footnote î ] errata: " 265 f. supp. 492" should be " 279 f. supp. 619" . carl rachlin, marvin m. karpatkin, arthur kinoy, melvin l. wulf, alvin j. bronstein and robert b. mckay for appellants. joe t. patterson, attorney general of mississippi, and martin r. mclendon, assistant attorney general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. mr. justice douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set down for argument. page 386 u.s. 483, 484

Full Judgment

CONNOR v. JOHNSON - 386 U.S. 483 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court Reports CONNOR v. JOHNSON, 386 U.S. 483 (1967) CONNOR v. JOHNSON, 386 U.S. 483 (1967) 386 U.S. 483

CONNOR ET AL. v. JOHNSON, GOVERNOR OF MISSISSIPPI, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
MISSISSIPPI. No. 999.
Decided March 27, 1967.

265 F. Supp. 492, î affirmed.

[ Footnote î ] ERRATA: " 265 F. Supp. 492" should be " 279 F. Supp. 619" .

Carl Rachlin, Marvin M. Karpatkin, Arthur Kinoy, Melvin L. Wulf, Alvin J. Bronstein and Robert B. McKay for appellants.

Joe T. Patterson, Attorney General of Mississippi, and Martin R. McLendon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set down for argument.

Page 386 U.S. 483, 484



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial