Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

SmithA.N.T Vs. State of Kerala

SmithA.N.T vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Aug 02, 2013
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1016977

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

SmithA.N.T

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....a leave vacancy for a period of five years from 7.6.2007. her appointment was approved from 7.6.2007 to 11.3.2008 on daily wage basis and from 2.6.2008 onwards on regular basis. feeling aggrieved by the same, the petitioner preferred w.p.(c). no.28513 of 2011 before this court. in terms of ext.p1 judgment, the first respondent passed ext.p2 order directing for approval of appointment of the petitioner from 7.6.2007 to 11.3.2008 also on regular basis. the petitioner has, now, preferred ext.p4 revision petition before the first respondent seeking approval of her appointment from 7.6.2007 on regular basis, without confining such approval till 11.3.2008. in other words, the request of the petitioner is w.p.(c).19259/13 2 to make the order of approval on regular basis from 2.6.2008 as continuation of the aforesaid order without any break in between. it is still pending consideration. i have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned government pleader. taking into account the limited prayer of the petitioner for an expeditious disposal of ext.p4, without making any observation as to the merits of the contentions raised in this writ petition, it is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on ext.p4 expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. sd/- c.t. ravikumar (judge) spc/ w.p.(c).19259/13 3 c.t. ravikumar, j.judgment september,2010 w.p.(c).19259/13 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST 2013 11TH SRAVANA, 1935 WP(C).No. 19259 of 2013 (F) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------- SMITHA.N.T, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, AKM HIGH SCHOOL KOTTOR, INDIANOOR, MALAPPURAM BY ADVS.SRI.AUGUSTINE JOSEPH SRI.K.S.ROCKEY SRI.TONY AUGUSTINE RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695001 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MALAPPURAM- 676505 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.A.FAYAZ THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-08-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 19259 of 2013 (F) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS: --------------------------- EXHIBIT P1:TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.28513/2011 DATED 23 03-2012. EXHIBIT P2:TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 19 05-2012 OF THE IST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3:TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 23 07-2012 BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4:TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 10 11-2012 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:NIL ----------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.

========================== W.P.(C). No.19259 OF 201.========================== Dated this the 2nd day of August, 2013 JUDGMENT The petitioner is presently working as Upper Primary School Assistant in AKM High School, Malappuram. She was appointed initially as against a leave vacancy for a period of five years from 7.6.2007. Her appointment was approved from 7.6.2007 to 11.3.2008 on daily wage basis and from 2.6.2008 onwards on regular basis. Feeling aggrieved by the same, the petitioner preferred W.P.(C). No.28513 of 2011 before this Court. In terms of Ext.P1 judgment, the first respondent passed Ext.P2 order directing for approval of appointment of the petitioner from 7.6.2007 to 11.3.2008 also on regular basis. The petitioner has, now, preferred Ext.P4 revision petition before the first respondent seeking approval of her appointment from 7.6.2007 on regular basis, without confining such approval till 11.3.2008. In other words, the request of the petitioner is W.P.(C).19259/13 2 to make the order of approval on regular basis from 2.6.2008 as continuation of the aforesaid order without any break in between. It is still pending consideration. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. Taking into account the limited prayer of the petitioner for an expeditious disposal of Ext.P4, without making any observation as to the merits of the contentions raised in this writ petition, it is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P4 expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- C.T. RAVIKUMAR (JUDGE) spc/ W.P.(C).19259/13 3 C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.

JUDGMENT September,2010 W.P.(C).19259/13 4

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial