Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

K.Anil Kumar Vs. Venugopal

K.Anil Kumar vs Venugopal

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 29, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1016756

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K.Anil Kumar

Respondent

Venugopal

Excerpt

.....known to the petitioner)devaswom commissioner travancore devaswom board, nanthancode thiruvananthapuram-695003.2. chandrika, (age and father's name not known to the petitioner) the cultural director travancore devaswom board thiruvananthapuram-695003.3. sreelatha, (age and father's name not known to the petitioner) the assistant devaswom commissioner travancoredevaswom board, varakal group, varkala-695141 4. g.sasikumar, (age and father's name not known to the petitioner) the sub group officer, kezhattingal devaswom attingal. by sri.a.n.rajan babu, sc, travancore devaswom board this contempt of court case (civil) having come up for admission on 29-07-2013, the court on the same day delivered the following: con.case(c).no. 876 of 2013 (s) in wp(c).12462/2013 2 appendix petitioner's exhibits: annexure a1 : interim order dtd 21.05.2013 passed by this honourable court. annexure a2 : proceeding dtd 25.06.2013 issued by the third respondent respondents' exhibits: nil true copy p.a to judge thomas p.joseph, j.========================= c.o(c).no.876 of 2013 in w.p(c).no.12462 of 2013 ============================ dated this the 29th day of july, 2013 judgment the learned counsel on both sides submit that the interim order is complied by the respondents. in the circumstance, it is not necessary to proceed with this contempt case. contempt case is closed. sd/- thomas p.joseph, judge sbna true copy p. a to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2013 7TH SRAVANA, 1935 Con.Case(C).No. 876 of 2013 (S) IN WP(C).12462/2013 ----------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 12462/2013 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 21 05.2013 PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN W.P(C): ----------------------------------- K.ANIL KUMAR, AGED 3 YEARS S/O S.KRISHNAN NAIR, "PANCHAVADYAM TEACHER" KSHETHRA KALA PEEDAM, ATTINGAL RESIDING AT "VADAKKECHEMBU PARAMBU", VELLALLOOR.P.O KESAVAPURAM, KILIMANOOR, PIN-695601. BY ADV. SRI.B.HARISH KUMAR RESPONDENT(S)/1 TO 4 RESPONDENTS IN W.P(C): ------------------------------------------- 1. VENUGOPAL, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER)DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, NANTHANCODE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695003.

2. CHANDRIKA, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE CULTURAL DIRECTOR TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695003.

3. SREELATHA, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE ASSISTANT DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER TRAVANCOREDEVASWOM BOARD, VARAKAL GROUP, VARKALA-695141 4. G.SASIKUMAR, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE SUB GROUP OFFICER, KEZHATTINGAL DEVASWOM ATTINGAL. BY SRI.A.N.RAJAN BABU, SC, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-07-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Con.Case(C).No. 876 of 2013 (S) IN WP(C).12462/2013 2 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE A1 : INTERIM ORDER DTD 21.05.2013 PASSED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT. ANNEXURE A2 : PROCEEDING DTD 25.06.2013 ISSUED BY the THIRD RESPONDENT RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL True Copy P.A to Judge THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J.

========================= C.O(C).No.876 of 2013 in W.P(C).No.12462 of 2013 ============================ Dated this the 29th day of July, 2013 JUDGMENT

The learned counsel on both sides submit that the interim order is complied by the respondents. In the circumstance, it is not necessary to proceed with this contempt case. Contempt case is closed. Sd/- THOMAS P.JOSEPH, JUDGE Sbna True Copy P. A to Judge

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial