Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Satheeshkumar Vs. Authorized Officer, Kollam Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd

Satheeshkumar vs Authorized Officer, Kollam Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 29, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1016754

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Satheeshkumar

Respondent

Authorized Officer, Kollam Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice v.chitambaresh monday, the 29th day of july 2013 7th sravana, 1935 wp(c).no. 15004 of 2013 (a) ---------------------------- petitioner -------------------------- satheesh kumar aged 4 years s/o.daniel, neethu nivas (chandra nivas) mundakkal east, cantonment p.o., kollam. by advs.sri.binu george smt.hemalatha respondent(s): ---------------------------- 1. authorized officer, kollam co-operative urban bank ltd no.960, kollam-691001.2. the branch manager the kollam co-operative urban bank ltd.no.960 y.m.c.a. road, kollam-691013. r1 byadv. sri.n.dharmadan (sr.) r1 byadv. smt.d.p.renu this writ petition (civil) having been finally heard on 29-07- 2013, the court on the same day delivered the following: wp(c).no. 15004 of 2013 (a) ---------------------------- appendix petitioner(s)' exhibits ------------------------------------- exhibit p1 : true copy of the receipt issued by the respondent bank dt.12-12-2012. exhibit p2 : true copy of the advocate commissioner notice dated 8 5- 2013. respondent(s)' exhibits --------------------------------------- nil true copy p.a to judge. smm v.chitambaresh,j.= = = = = = = = = = = w.p.(c) no.15004 of 2013 = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = dated this the 29th day of july, 2013 judgment the petitioner expressly gives up all the contentions in the writ petition and is rest contended with a facility to repay the amount due to the second respondent bank in easy instalments. i permit the petitioner to repay the amount due to the second respondent bank in five equal monthly instalments starting from 1-10-2013.2. the coercive proceedings pursuant to ext.p2 notice shall be put on hold if the petitioner complies with the conditions in time. the coercive proceedings can surge ahead in case the petitioner commits default in the payment of anyone of the instalments as directed above. the writ petition is disposed of. v.chitambaresh judge smm 2

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2013 7TH SRAVANA, 1935 WP(C).No. 15004 of 2013 (A) ---------------------------- PETITIONER -------------------------- SATHEESH KUMAR AGED 4 YEARS S/O.DANIEL, NEETHU NIVAS (CHANDRA NIVAS) MUNDAKKAL EAST, CANTONMENT P.O., KOLLAM. BY ADVS.SRI.BINU GEORGE SMT.HEMALATHA RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. AUTHORIZED OFFICER, KOLLAM CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD NO.960, KOLLAM-691001.

2. THE BRANCH MANAGER THE KOLLAM CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD.NO.960 Y.M.C.A. ROAD, KOLLAM-691013. R1 BYADV. SRI.N.DHARMADAN (SR.) R1 BYADV. SMT.D.P.RENU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29-07- 2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 15004 of 2013 (A) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK DT.12-12-2012. EXHIBIT P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER NOTICE DATED 8 5- 2013. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL TRUE COPY P.A TO JUDGE. SMM V.CHITAMBARESH,J.

= = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No.15004 of 2013 = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = Dated this the 29th day of July, 2013 JUDGMENT

The petitioner expressly gives up all the contentions in the writ petition and is rest contended with a facility to repay the amount due to the second respondent bank in easy instalments. I permit the petitioner to repay the amount due to the second respondent bank in five equal monthly instalments starting from 1-10-2013.

2. The coercive proceedings pursuant to Ext.P2 notice shall be put on hold if the petitioner complies with the conditions in time. The coercive proceedings can surge ahead in case the petitioner commits default in the payment of anyone of the instalments as directed above. The writ petition is disposed of. V.CHITAMBARESH JUDGE smm 2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial