Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Venugopal Vs. Santha

Venugopal vs Santha

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 29, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1016702

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Venugopal

Respondent

Santha

Excerpt

in the high court of keralaat ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice thottathil b.radhakrishnan & the honourable mr. justice babu mathew p.joseph monday,the 29th day of july 2013 7th sravana, 1935 f.a.o.no.277 of 2012 ----------------------------- against the order in i.,a.no.5968/12 in o.s.no.776/2008 of i addl.sub court, thrissur appellant/respondent/plaintiff: ------------------------------------------------------- venugopal, aged 4 years s/o.konjath krishnan nair, kozhukully desom thrissur district. by advs.sri.santhosh.p. poduval smt.rajitha.r respondents/petitioners /defendants: ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1. santha, w/o.late madhavan, geetha nilayam, mulayam village thrissur taluk, thrissur district-680 001.2. manjusha, d/o.late madhavan, geetha nilayam, mulayam village thrissur taluk, thrissur district-680 001.3. mahesh s/o.late madhavan, geetha nilayam, mulayam village thrissur taluk, thrissur district-680 001. by adv. sri.dinesh r.shenoy by adv. sri.g.harikrishnan (tripunithura) by adv. sri.a.ratheesh this first appeal from orders having been finally heard on 29.07.2013, the court on the same day delivered the following: thottathil b. radhakrishnan & babu mathew p. joseph, jj.----------------------------------------------- f.a.o no. 277 of 2012 & i.a. no. 1175 of 2013 ----------------------------------------------- dated this the 29th day of july, 2013 judgment thottathil b. radhakrishnan, j.perused affidavit filed in support of the captioned interlocutory application. the i.a. is allowed and the f.a.o. is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue remedy for refund of court fee as per terms of settlement, if any, in the suits referred to in the captioned interlocutory application. sd/- thottathil b. radhakrishnan judge sd/- babu mathew p. joseph judge kvr/30-7 /true copy/ p.s. to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALAAT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH MONDAY,THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2013 7TH SRAVANA, 1935 F.A.O.No.277 of 2012 ----------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN I.,A.No.5968/12 in O.S.No.776/2008 of I ADDL.SUB COURT, THRISSUR APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF: ------------------------------------------------------- VENUGOPAL, AGED 4 YEARS S/O.KONJATH KRISHNAN NAIR, KOZHUKULLY DESOM THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.SANTHOSH.P. PODUVAL SMT.RAJITHA.R RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS /DEFENDANTS: ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SANTHA, W/O.LATE MADHAVAN, GEETHA NILAYAM, MULAYAM VILLAGE THRISSUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 001.

2. MANJUSHA, D/O.LATE MADHAVAN, GEETHA NILAYAM, MULAYAM VILLAGE THRISSUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 001.

3. MAHESH S/O.LATE MADHAVAN, GEETHA NILAYAM, MULAYAM VILLAGE THRISSUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 001. BY ADV. SRI.DINESH R.SHENOY BY ADV. SRI.G.HARIKRISHNAN (TRIPUNITHURA) BY ADV. SRI.A.RATHEESH THIS FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDERS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29.07.2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN & BABU MATHEW P. JOSEPH, JJ.

----------------------------------------------- F.A.O No. 277 of 2012 & I.A. No. 1175 of 2013 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of July, 2013 JUDGMENT THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.

Perused affidavit filed in support of the captioned interlocutory application. The I.A. is allowed and the F.A.O. is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue remedy for refund of court fee as per terms of settlement, if any, in the suits referred to in the captioned interlocutory application. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN JUDGE Sd/- BABU MATHEW P. JOSEPH JUDGE kvr/30-7 /True copy/ P.S. to Judge

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial