Ramesh.R Vs. State of Kerala

Ramesh.R vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 29, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1016673

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1016673
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh
Decided On: Jul 29, 2013
Subject: Sales Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Sales Tax

Key legal issue: Sales Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramesh.R

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....delivered the following: wp(c) no. 18829/2013 appendix petitioner(s) exhibits exhibit p1 : true copy of the registration certificate of the lorry bearing no. kl 0.bv 945.owned by the petitioner. exhibit p2 : true copy of the insurance certificate of the lorry bearing no. kl 0.bv 945.owned by the petitioner. exhibit p3 : true copies of the goods carriage permit of the lorry bearing no. kl 0.bv 945.owned by the petitioner. exhibit p4 : true copy of the order issued by the 3rd respondent under section 4 (2) of the kvat act. respondent(s) exhibits : nil /true copy/ p.a. to judge. v. chitambaresh, j -------------------------------- wp(c) no. 18829 of 201.------------------------------------ dated this the 29th day of july, 2013 judgment the petitioner seeks release of the vehicle (kl 0.bv 9459.carrying the goods. the goods have been detained under ext.p4 notice.2. i direct the third respondent to release the vehicle (kl 0.bv 9459.alone to the petitioner on his executing a simple bond without sureties to the satisfaction of the third respondent. the goods shall be unloaded at the place allotted by the third respondent at the expense of the petitioner. the writ petition is disposed of. v. chitambaresh judge ncd

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALAAT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY,THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2013 7TH SRAVANA, 1935 WP(C).No. 18829 of 2013 (C) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- RAMESH.R, 11/194 A, SAIKRIPA VADACODE P.O. KANAGARAPPADY KOCHI - 682 BY ADVS.SRI.SHAJI P.CHALY SRI.S.GOPAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. STATEOF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY SECRETARIATE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN 69.001.

2. INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER TAX TOWER, 4TH FLOOR KILLIPPALAM, KARAMANA P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 69 002.

3. INTELLIGENCE INSPECTOR SQUAD NO. IV COMMERCIAL TAXES THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 69 002. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. MANJO P. KUNJACHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-07-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 18829/2013 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF THE LORRY BEARING NO. KL 0.BV 945.OWNED BY THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE INSURANCE CERTIFICATE OF THE LORRY BEARING NO. KL 0.BV 945.OWNED BY THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P3 : TRUE COPIES OF THE GOODS CARRIAGE PERMIT OF THE LORRY BEARING NO. KL 0.BV 945.OWNED BY THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 4 (2) OF THE KVAT ACT. RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 18829 OF 201.------------------------------------ Dated this the 29th day of July, 2013 JUDGMENT The petitioner seeks release of the vehicle (KL 0.BV 9459.carrying the goods. The goods have been detained under Ext.P4 notice.

2. I direct the third respondent to release the vehicle (KL 0.BV 9459.alone to the petitioner on his executing a simple bond without sureties to the satisfaction of the third respondent. The goods shall be unloaded at the place allotted by the third respondent at the expense of the petitioner. The Writ Petition is disposed of. V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2013 Same Parties Ramesh.R vs State of Kerala Same Subject Sales Tax Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh