Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Manager Vs. the State of Kerala

The Manager vs The State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 29, 2013
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1016672

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Manager

Respondent

The State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....dated this the 29th day of july, 2013 judgment the first petitioner is the manager of the st.thomas upper primary school, parannur and he appointed the second petitioner as part-time urdu teacher in the said school with effect from 01.07.2011. according to the petitioners the said appointment was made against a retirement vacancy. the grievance of the petitioner is with respect to the non-approval of the said appointment of the second petitioner. the present grievance of the petitioner is that though a revision petition was filed against ext.p6 order passed by the director of public instructions before the government and on 5.2.2013 a hearing was conducted thereon no final order has been passed so far. the learned government pleader on instructions submitted that final order in ext.p8 revision petition is yet to be passed. considering the fact that the hearing on ext.p8 revision petition was w.p.(c) no. 17949 o”2. conducted as early as on 5.2.2013 an order thereon is yet to be passed this writ petition has been disposed of, without making any observation as to the merits of the contentions, with a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on ext.p8 expeditiously, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. sd/- c.t.ravikumar, judge dlk

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR MONDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2013 7TH SRAVANA, 1935 WP(C).No. 17949 of 2013 (P) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- 1. THE MANAGER ST.THOMAS UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL, PARANNUR, CHOONDAL THRISSUR DISTRICT.

2. P.SHAMSUDHEEN URDU TRECHER (PART-TIME) ST.THOMAS UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL, PARANNUR, CHOONDAL THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETRARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUATION DEPARTMENT, SERETRIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014.

3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION THRISSUR AT AYYANTHOLE-680 003.

4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 506.

5. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 503. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. A.LOWSY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-07-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 17949 of 2013 (P) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1.TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT OF THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 1 7/2011. EXHIBIT P2.TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED 2 9/2011. EXHIBIT P3.TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE 2ND PETITIONER (REVISED PROPOSAL). EXHIBIT P4.TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED 28 12/2011. EXHIBIT P5.TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR DATED 2 4/2012. EXHIBIT P6.TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER DATED 13 6/2012. EXHIBIT P7.TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 17 10/2012. EXHIBIT P8.TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT DATED 10 1/2013 WITHOUT ANNEXURES. EXHIBIT P9.TRUE COPY OF THE HEARING NOTICE OF THE GOVERNEMNT DATED 25 1/2013. EXHIBIT P10.TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR OF THE GOVERNMENT DATED 10 4/2012. EXHIBIT P11.TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(RT) NO.2198/06/G.EDN DATED 30 5/2006 OF THE GOVERNEMNT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. dlk C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 17949 of 2013 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of July, 2013 JUDGMENT The first petitioner is the Manager of the St.Thomas Upper Primary School, Parannur and he appointed the second petitioner as Part-time Urdu Teacher in the said school with effect from 01.07.2011. According to the petitioners the said appointment was made against a retirement vacancy. The grievance of the petitioner is with respect to the non-approval of the said appointment of the second petitioner. The present grievance of the petitioner is that though a revision petition was filed against Ext.P6 order passed by the Director of Public Instructions before the Government and on 5.2.2013 a hearing was conducted thereon no final order has been passed so far. The learned Government Pleader on instructions submitted that final order in Ext.P8 revision petition is yet to be passed. Considering the fact that the hearing on Ext.P8 revision petition was W.P.(C) NO. 17949 o”

2. conducted as early as on 5.2.2013 an order thereon is yet to be passed this writ petition has been disposed of, without making any observation as to the merits of the contentions, with a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P8 expeditiously, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE dlk

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial