Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Raveendran Vs. Thilakan

Raveendran vs Thilakan

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 29, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1016630

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Raveendran

Respondent

Thilakan

Excerpt

before the lok adalat organised by the high court legal services committee at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice t.v.ramakrishnan(retd.judge) & smt.k.sreelatha devi (advocate) & smt.saira ravikumar (member) tuesday, the 20th day of november 2012 29th karthika 193 r.s.a.no.81 of 2012(b) --------------------------------- (a.s.290/2006 of the first additional district court,thrissur) (o.s.no.896/2003 of munsiff court, chavakkad) appellant/defendant/defendant: -------------------------------------------------------- raveendran, aged 6 years, s/o. erenezhathuh padinjattayil raman @ kunchipappu, residing at erenezhathuh padinjattayil house, thalikkulam village, chavakkadu thaluk, thrissur district by adv. sri.m.b.prajith respondent/appellant/plaintiff: ------------------------------------------------------- 1. thilakan, aged 6 years, s/o. andezhathu sankaran, andezhathu house, thalikkulam amsom, chavakkadu thaluk, thrissur district. pin-680 506.2. nalini, aged 6 years, w/o thilakan, thalikkulam amsonm, chavakkadu taluk, thrissur district. pin”506. by adv. sri.c.a.anoop this regular second appeal having come up for determination before the lok adalat on 20-11-2012, the adalt on the same day delivered the following: mjl n.k. balakrishnan, j.----------------------------- r.s.a. no.81 of 2012 ----------------------------- dated this the 29th day of july, 2013 judgment the appellant's counsel absent. there is no representation, when taken up again in the afternoon. hence dismissed for default. sd/- n.k. balakrishnan, judge. scl. true copy pa to judge

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT ORGANISED BY THE HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.V.RAMAKRISHNAN(RETD.JUDGE) & SMT.K.SREELATHA DEVI (ADVOCATE) & SMT.SAIRA RAVIKUMAR (MEMBER) TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012 29TH KARTHIKA 193 R.S.A.No.81 of 2012(B) --------------------------------- (A.S.290/2006 OF THE FIRST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT,THRISSUR) (O.S.NO.896/2003 OF MUNSIFF COURT, CHAVAKKAD) APPELLANT/DEFENDANT/DEFENDANT: -------------------------------------------------------- RAVEENDRAN, AGED 6 YEARS, S/O. ERENEZHATHUH PADINJATTAYIL RAMAN @ KUNCHIPAPPU, RESIDING AT ERENEZHATHUH PADINJATTAYIL HOUSE, THALIKKULAM VILLAGE, CHAVAKKADU THALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.M.B.PRAJITH RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF: ------------------------------------------------------- 1. THILAKAN, AGED 6 YEARS, S/O. ANDEZHATHU SANKARAN, ANDEZHATHU HOUSE, THALIKKULAM AMSOM, CHAVAKKADU THALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. PIN-680 506.

2. NALINI, AGED 6 YEARS, W/O THILAKAN, THALIKKULAM AMSONM, CHAVAKKADU TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. PIN”

506. BY ADV. SRI.C.A.ANOOP THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR DETERMINATION BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT ON 20-11-2012, THE ADALT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: MJL N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, J.

----------------------------- R.S.A. No.81 of 2012 ----------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of July, 2013 JUDGMENT The appellant's counsel absent. There is no representation, when taken up again in the afternoon. Hence dismissed for default. Sd/- N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Scl. True Copy PA to Judge

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial