Mathew.M.J. Vs. Ajithkumar

Mathew.M.J. vs Ajithkumar

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 30, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1016584

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1016584
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh
Decided On: Jul 30, 2013
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mathew.M.J.

Respondent

Ajithkumar

Excerpt

.....been finally heard on 30-07-2013, the court on the same day delivered the following: con.case(c).no. 855 of 2013 (s) in wp(c).13070/2013 appendix petitioners annexures annexure 1 copy of the application dated 17 5-2013 filed by the petitioner for the grant of four months temporary permit on the route periya mananthavady annexure 1 copy of the communication dated 9 5-2013 received from the regional transport office, wayanad in the name of the petitioner. annexure 11 copy of the clearance certificate dated 17 5-2013 issued from the regional transport office, malappuram annexure iv copy of the judgment made in w.p no.13070/2013 dated 24 5-2013 respondents annexures nil true copy p.a to judge smm v.chitambaresh,j.= = = = = = = = = = = c.o(c) no. 855 of 2013 = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = dated this the 30th day of july, 2013 judgment ext.p1 application for temporary permit has since been disposed of by annexure r1 order. whether the petitioner was put on notice in the exercise can be raised when annexure r1 order is challenged. it is open to the petitioner to challenge annexure r1 order in a statutory appeal urging all contentions available. the contempt of court case is disposed of. v.chitambaresh judge smm

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JULY2013/8TH SRAVANA, 1935 Con.Case(C).No. 855 of 2013 (S) IN WP(C).13070/2013 ----------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 13070/2013 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 24 05-2013 PETITIONER: --------------------- MATHEW.M.J.

AGED 3 YEARS S/O M.V.JOSEPH, MUNDAKUTTY P.O., MANANTHAVADY WAYANAD. BY ADVS.SRI.G.HARIHARAN SRI.PRAVEEN.H. RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDNET/IST RESPONDENT: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SRI.AJITHKUMAR AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER SECRETARY, REGIONALTRANSPORT AUTHORITY, WAYANAD KALPETTA, PIN:673 122. R1 BYADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. MANOJ .P. KUNJACHAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30-07-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Con.Case(C).No. 855 of 2013 (S) IN WP(C).13070/2013 APPENDIX PETITIONERS ANNEXURES ANNEXURE 1 COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 17 5-2013 FILED BY THE PETITIONER FOR THE GRANT OF FOUR MONTHS TEMPORARY PERMIT ON THE ROUTE PERIYA MANANTHAVADY ANNEXURE 1 COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 9 5-2013 RECEIVED FROM THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, WAYANAD IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER. ANNEXURE 11 COPY of the CLEARANCE CERTIFICATE DATED 17 5-2013 ISSUED FROM THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, MALAPPURAM ANNEXURE IV COPY OF THE JUDGMENT MADE IN W.P NO.13070/2013 DATED 24 5-2013 RESPONDENTS ANNEXURES NIL TRUE COPY P.A TO JUDGE SMM V.CHITAMBARESH,J.

= = = = = = = = = = = C.O(C) No. 855 of 2013 = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = Dated this the 30th day of July, 2013 JUDGMENT

Ext.P1 application for temporary permit has since been disposed of by Annexure R1 order. Whether the petitioner was put on notice in the exercise can be raised when Annexure R1 order is challenged. It is open to the petitioner to challenge Annexure R1 order in a statutory appeal urging all contentions available. The Contempt of Court Case is disposed of. V.CHITAMBARESH JUDGE smm

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2013 Same Parties Mathew.M.J. vs Ajithkumar Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh