Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

infant Thomas Vs. P.C. Scaria

infant Thomas vs P.C. Scaria

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 30, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1016568

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

infant Thomas

Respondent

P.C. Scaria

Excerpt

.....idukki, pin ”561. by adv. sri.latheesh sebastian this contempt of court case (civil) having been finally heard on 30-07-2013, the court on the same day delivered the following: appendix in coc.576/13 petitioner's annexuers: annexure i: copy of judgment in wpc.29804/12 dt.20.2.13. annexure ii: copy of postal receipt dt.11.3.13. respondents' annexures: annexure r1(a): copy of resolution of the adimaly grama panchayat committee dt.18.4.13. annexure r1(b): copy of report submitted by the assistant engineer, lsgd section. annexure r1(c): copy of letter dt.20.5.13. true copy p.a.to judge dsn k.surendra mohan, j.-------------------------------------------------- contempt case(c)no.576 of 2013 -------------------------------------------------- dated this the 30th day of july, 2013 judgment the respondent has filed an affidavit producing copy of proceedings dated 20.5.2013 issued in compliance with the direction of this court in the judgment dated 20.2.2013. as per the said order, the petitioner has been granted payment for the additional work conducted. since the order of this court has already been complied with, it is not necessary to pursue this contempt case, any further. the same is therefore closed. sd/-(k.surendra mohan) judge. dsn

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALAAT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JULY 2013 8TH SRAVANA, 1935 Con.Case(C).No. 576 of 2013 (S) IN WP(C).29804/2012 ----------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 29804/2012 DATED 20 2.13 PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN W.P.(C)29804/2012:-: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INFANT THOMAS S/O.THOMAS, MATTEL HOUSE, MACHIPLAVU IDUKKI. BY ADV. SRI.P.P.JACOB RESPONDENT(S)/3RD RESPONDENT IN W.P.(C)29804/2012:-: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P.C. SCARIA, AGED 6 YEARS S/O.VARKEY, PATTARUKUDIYIL HOUSE, PRESIDENT COMMITTEE OF THE ADIMALY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, ADIMALY IDUKKI, PIN ”

561. BY ADV. SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30-07-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN COC.576/13 PETITIONER'S ANNEXUERS: ANNEXURE I: COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WPC.29804/12 DT.20.2.13. ANNEXURE II: COPY OF POSTAL RECEIPT DT.11.3.13. RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE R1(A): COPY OF RESOLUTION OF THE ADIMALY GRAMA PANCHAYAT COMMITTEE DT.18.4.13. ANNEXURE R1(B): COPY OF REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, LSGD SECTION. ANNEXURE R1(C): COPY OF LETTER DT.20.5.13. TRUE COPY P.A.TO JUDGE dsn K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J.

-------------------------------------------------- Contempt Case(C)No.576 Of 2013 -------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 30th DAY OF JULY, 2013 JUDGMENT The respondent has filed an affidavit producing copy of proceedings dated 20.5.2013 issued in compliance with the direction of this Court in the judgment dated 20.2.2013. As per the said order, the petitioner has been granted payment for the additional work conducted. Since the order of this Court has already been complied with, it is not necessary to pursue this Contempt Case, any further. The same is therefore closed. Sd/-(K.SURENDRA MOHAN) JUDGE. dsn

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial