Sethu K. Vs. Managing Director, Ksrtc

Sethu K. vs Managing Director, Ksrtc

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 30, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1016511

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1016511
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice C.K.Abdul Rehim
Decided On: Jul 30, 2013
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sethu K.

Respondent

Managing Director, Ksrtc

Excerpt

.....(civil) having come up for admission on 30-07-2013, the court on the same day delivered the following: mn ...2/- wp(c).no. 18902 of 2013 (k) ---------------------------------------- appendix petitioners' exhibits ------------------------------------- ext. p1: copy of the memorandum dated 06 02.2008 issued by the 1st respondent in favour of the petitioner. ext. p2: copy of the representation dated 07 06.2012 submitted by the petitioner before the 1st respondent. ext. p3: copy of the representation dated 7 06.2012 submitted by the petitioner before the minister for transport, thiruvananthapuram. ext. p4: copy of the application for transfer dated 25 4.2013 submitted by the petitioner before the 2nd respondent. respondents' exhibits : nil ---------------------------------------------------------- //true copy// p.a. to judge mn c.k. abdul rehim, j.------------------------------------------------- w.p.(c) no. 18902 of 201.------------------------------------------------- dated this the 30th day of july, 2013 judgment grievance of the petitioner is regarding non-consideration of his request for transfer. exhibit p4 application as well as exts.p2 and p3 representations submitted in this regard before the 1st respondent has not been considered, is the complaint.2. heard; counsel for the petitioner and standing counsel for the respondents. i am of the opinion that interest of justice will be served by directing an early consideration of ext.p2 to p4.3. therefore the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider ext.p4 application for transfer in the light of exts.p2 to p3 representation and to take an appropriate decision, if the same has already been received. a decision shall be taken on the request for transfer within an outer limit of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. sd/- c.k. abdul rehim, judge. amg true copy p.a to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM TUESDAY,THE 30TH DAY OF JULY 2013 8TH SRAVANA, 1935 WP(C).No. 18902 of 2013 (K) ---------------------------- PETITIONER : -------------------- SETHU K., AGED 3 YEARS, S/O.KESHAVAN.K., AMBALAPARAMBIL, KAITHAKKARA ELAPPUPARA P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN-689656. BY ADV. SRI.K.KESAVANKUTTY RESPONDENT(S) : ---------------------------- 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION TRANSPORT BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-23.

2. THE ASSISTANT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ERNAKULAM DEPOT, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682011. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA, SC, KSRTC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-07-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- WP(C).No. 18902 of 2013 (K) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT. P1: COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM DATED 06 02.2008 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER. EXT. P2: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 07 06.2012 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT. P3: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 7 06.2012 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE MINISTER FOR TRANSPORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. EXT. P4: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR TRANSFER DATED 25 4.2013 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL ---------------------------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn C.K. ABDUL REHIM, J.

------------------------------------------------- W.P.(c) No. 18902 OF 201.------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 30th DAY OF JULY, 2013 JUDGMENT

Grievance of the petitioner is regarding non-consideration of his request for transfer. Exhibit P4 application as well as Exts.P2 and P3 representations submitted in this regard before the 1st respondent has not been considered, is the complaint.

2. Heard; counsel for the petitioner and standing counsel for the respondents. I am of the opinion that interest of justice will be served by directing an early consideration of Ext.P2 to P4.

3. Therefore the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P4 application for transfer in the light of Exts.P2 to P3 representation and to take an appropriate decision, if the same has already been received. A decision shall be taken on the request for transfer within an outer limit of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- C.K. ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE. AMG True copy P.A to Judge

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2013 Same Parties Sethu K. vs Managing Director, Ksrtc Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice C.K.Abdul Rehim