Radha Vs. Sudeerkumar

Radha vs Sudeerkumar

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 30, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1016502

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1016502
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice K.Harilal
Decided On: Jul 30, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Radha

Respondent

Sudeerkumar

Excerpt

.....sri. liju v. stephen this criminal revision petition having come up for admission on 30-07-2013, the court on the same day passed the following: k. harilal, j.------------------------------------------------------ crl.r.p.no. 1505 of 2013 ------------------------------------------------------ dated this the 30th day of july, 2013 order during the pendency of this revision filed against the conviction and sentence of the revision petitioner under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act, the parties have settled the matter and have filed crl.m.a. no.5546/2013 to the effect that the matter has been compounded. the said petition has been signed by the revision petitioner as well as the 1st respondent and their respective counsel. in the light of this, crl.r.p. is disposed of and the judgments under appeal are set aside and the composition of the offence is recorded.2. it is needless to mention that this composition shall crl.r.p.no. 1505 of 2013 -:2. :- have the effect of acquittal of the revision petitioner of the offence punishable under section 138 of the n.i. act within the meaning of section 320(8) cr.p.c. sd/- (k. harilal, judge) nan/ //true copy// p.s. to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JULY 2013 8TH SRAVANA, 1935 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1505 of 2013 () -------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CRL.A. 500/2009 OF THE SESSIONS COURT, PALAKKAD DATED 05 02-2011 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN ST 310/2009 of J.M.F.C.-III, PALAKKAD DATED 06 08-2009 REVISION PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED: --------------------------------------------------------- RADHA,45 YEARS, W/O RAJENDRAN, QRTS.NO.399-A, RLY. QUARTERS, RLY. COLONY, KALLEKULANGARA, OLAVAKKODE, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.U.BALAGANGADHARAN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT: ------------------------------------ 1. SUDEERKUMAR, S/O A. BALAKRISHNAN, MANOJ NIVAS, F.C.I. ROAD, PUDUPPARIYARAM, PALAKKAD-678 520.

2. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-682 031. R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.H.HANIL KUMAR R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. LIJU V. STEPHEN THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-07-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K. HARILAL, J.

------------------------------------------------------ Crl.R.P.No. 1505 of 2013 ------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 30th day of July, 2013 ORDER During the pendency of this revision filed against the conviction and sentence of the Revision Petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the parties have settled the matter and have filed Crl.M.A. No.5546/2013 to the effect that the matter has been compounded. The said petition has been signed by the Revision Petitioner as well as the 1st respondent and their respective counsel. In the light of this, Crl.R.P. is disposed of and the judgments under appeal are set aside and the composition of the offence is recorded.

2. It is needless to mention that this composition shall Crl.R.P.No. 1505 of 2013 -:

2. :- have the effect of acquittal of the Revision Petitioner of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the N.I. Act within the meaning of Section 320(8) Cr.P.C. Sd/- (K. HARILAL, JUDGE) Nan/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2013 Same Parties Radha vs Sudeerkumar Same Subject Education Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice K.Harilal