Rosenbloom Vs. Virginia

Rosenbloom vs Virginia

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-12-1967

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101619

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/101619
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jun-12-1967
Case Number: 388 U.S. 450
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rosenbloom

Respondent

Virginia

Excerpt

rosenbloom v. virginia - 388 u.s. 450 (1967) u.s. supreme court rosenbloom v. virginia, 388 u.s. 450 (1967) 388 u.s. 450 rosenbloom v. virginia. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of appeals of virginia. no. 366. decided june 12, 1967. certiorari granted; reversed. seymour horwitz and melvin l. wulf for petitioner. james b. wilkinson for respondent. per curiam. the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the supreme court of appeals of virginia is reversed. sunshine book co. v. summerfield, 355 u.s. 372 . mr. justice harlan adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in roth v. united states, 354 u.s. 476, 496 , and memoirs v. massachusetts, 383 u.s. 413, 455 , and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm. page 388 u.s. 450, 451

Full Judgment

ROSENBLOOM v. VIRGINIA - 388 U.S. 450 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court ROSENBLOOM v. VIRGINIA, 388 U.S. 450 (1967) 388 U.S. 450

ROSENBLOOM v. VIRGINIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF
VIRGINIA. No. 366.
Decided June 12, 1967.

Certiorari granted; reversed.

Seymour Horwitz and Melvin L. Wulf for petitioner.

James B. Wilkinson for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia is reversed. Sunshine Book Co. v. Summerfield, 355 U.S. 372 .

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496 , and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455 , and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm.

Page 388 U.S. 450, 451

Same Parties Rosenbloom vs Virginia Same Subject Land Acquisition